So compared to the time of St. Robert Bellarmine we have a new ecclesiology and soteriology with heretical consequences: the Feeneyite theology of St. Robert Bellarmine is replaced with Cushingism

(26:11) So to claim that Vatican Council II is giving some kind of aberrant definition of the Church is to say that St. Robert Bellarmine,did not give a reliable definition-St.Robert Fastiggi

Lionel:

The definition of Vatican Council II, cited by Dr.Fastiggi is similar to that of St. Robert Bellarmine.However the understanding of what is faith has changed. Since at the time of St. Robert Bellarmine the theology was Feeneyite. Now it is Cushingite.

Ecclesiology has changed. There was the old, traditional ecclesiology at the time of St. Robert Bellarmine based on EENS( Feeneyite).While at the time of Vatican Council II there was a new ecclesiology.It was Cushingite.There was was a new EENS.It was an EENS which was Cushingite.The traditional interpretation of EENS( Feeneyite) was rejected.

So compared to the time of St. Robert Bellarmine we have a change in ecclesiology and salvation theology( soteriology). These are heretical consequences. The Nicene Creed is changed and the Athanasius Creed is rejected. The Nicene Creed is Cushingite and the Athanasius Creed is rejected since it is Feeneyite.

-Lionel Andrades