Thursday, June 16, 2016

I think we can accept it as a hypothetical case, along with St. Alphonsus Liguori.

From the blog From Rome  : Il Rinascimento della Scolastica1!

We have never affirmed that a hypothetical case proves that a revealed and defined rule of salvation established by the lips of the Incarnate God has an exception.

Lionel:
So a hypothetical case is not revealed in the flesh in 2016 it is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).


That being the Case, St. Alphonsus a doctor of the Church declared before Vatican I, said that by baptismus flaminis e baptismum sanguinis a persona can be justified and saved...
Lionel:
So was the baptism of desire and blood a hypothetical case for you as it is for me?
I think we can accept it as a hypothetical case, along with St. Alphonsus Liguori.
So did the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston in the second part, make a mistake when it assumed that the baptism of desire and blood were not hypothetical but an exception to EENS according to Fr.Leonard Feeney?
-Lionel Andrades

No comments: