Ecclesiology Debate: Bp. Donald Sanborn vs. Dr. Robert Fastiggi (2004) : irrational non traditional Cushingite theology adopted

There are no known cases of someone saved in invincible ignorance with or without the baptism of water.So being saved in invincible ignorance does not refer to an explicit case.So it is not part of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as Bishop Sanborn says.

Bishop Sanborn is trying to the Cushingite theology so he assumed that being saved in invincible ignorance is relevant to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, since it refers to known exceptions, practical exceptions or it is a hypothetical case which is not hypothetical.-L.A
p.s.I have only watched the introduction.Over time I will try and watch the whole video.

Bishop Sanborn uses situation ethics, subjectivism and known exceptions to EENS, as a reasoning, to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition.The liberals do the same

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/bishop-sanborn-uses-situation-ethics.html

The sedevacantist Bishop Sanborn uses Cushingism to interpret Vatican Council II and seems unaware of the Feeneyite choice

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/the-sedevacantist-bishop-sanborn-uses.html

Ave Maria University like the sedevacantist seminary in Florida uses irrational Cushingism instead of traditional Feeneyism to interpret Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/02/ave-maria-university-like-sedevacantist.html

________________________________________

THE ECCLESIOLOGY OF THE CONSTITUTION ON THE CHURCH, VATICAN II, ‘LUMEN GENTIUM’ IS FEENEYITE : FOR CARDINAL RATZINGER AND THE INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION IT IS CUSHINGITE

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/the-ecclesiology-of-constitution-on.html