May be someone who is in contact with Cardinal Burke and Bishop Schneider could ask them these two questions and send me their response

Bishop Athansius Schneider recently called for a Syllabus of Errors on Vatican Council II  and Cardinal Burke last Saturday  called for a new catechesis  when both of them do not see the factual mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, upon which so much of Vatican Council II is based.

Vatican Council II has a hermeneutic of continuity only because hypothetical  cases are considered explicit.Subjective cases are considered objective.

If they correct this error and re-read Vatican Council II the Council does not contradict the traditional teachings of the Church on other religions and Christian communities.Vatican Council II does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

Cardinal Burke and Bishop Schneider, like Pope Francis, have accepted that there is salvation outside the Church. Since for both of them being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire refer to objective cases. They would have to be objective for them to be exceptions to EENs.This was the thinking of the cardinals who issued and approved the Letter of the Holy Office during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII.

They inferred that I.I and BOD were explicit.

They assumed hypothetical cases of the the BOD and I.I were explicit exceptions to the Feeneyite traditional interpretation of EENS. In other words they could physically meet or see persons  saved without the baptism of water and who did not need to formally convert into the Church. They could know someone on earth who would be saved without formally having to enter the Church.

This cannot be known to human beings!

It is with this error  that Vatican Council II has a hermeneutic of discontinuity with Tradition.

 If Cardinal Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider  avoid this error Vatican Council II is not a break with the past.

1.They both simply have to say that there are no known cases of the baptism of desire or being saved in invincible ignorance in 2016.This is factual. There cannot be any such known case.

2.They have to simply say that  LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc in Vatican Council II refers to hypothetical cases and not objectively known exceptions to EENS according to the 16th century missionaries.

This means there is no known salvation outside the Church, past or present.

May be someone who is in contact with them could ask them these two questions and send me the response of Cardinal Burke and Bishop Schneider. This is an important issue for the re-conciliation of the SSPX with the Vatican.Doctrinally the Vatican is in error but the SSPX bishops and priests, are not aware of it.They all see the vague result of Vatican Council II being a break with EENS and the Syllabus of Errors but are unaware that this rupture is caused by assuming hypothetical cases are objective known.If this error is avoided Vatican Council II would be traditional.-Lionel Andrades


Video :Marcia per la Vita - Roma 8 maggio 2016
https://youtu.be/Xz6ksYz1KZE