Wednesday, May 18, 2016

If Bishop Fellay interprets Vatican Council II with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism he will be considered anti-Semitic.Instead he is willing to reach an agreement with Rome in which Vatican Council II will continue to be interpreted with an irrational premise to produce a non traditional conclusion.

– Would you be ready to grant them the status of a personal prelature?
Pope Francis: That would be a possible solution but beforehand it will be necessary to establish a fundamental agreement with them. The Second Vatican Council has its value. We will advance slowly and patiently.
http://www.la-croix.com/Religion/Pape/INTERVIEW-Pope-Francis-2016-05-17-1200760633
Bishop Fellay seems ready to sign an agreement with the Vatican which is there before him according to his interview with the National Catholic Register.
All indications are that he will not affirm Vatican Council II as not contradicting the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).Instead for him,  the Vatican and the Left, Vatican Council II is a break with the dogma EENS.
This is the politically correct position of Bishop Fellay and the SSPX.
If he interprets Vatican Council II without subjectivism made object, without the exceptions- theory, then the Council would affirm the dogma EENS according to the 16th century missionaries. This would make the SSPX anti Semitic.He would be saying all Jews, and other non Catholics, need to formally enter the Church to avoid Hell.
We know that Bishop Williamson was sidelined by the Vatican and the SSPX because of his anti-Semitic position.Bishop  Fellay and the Vatican avoided any support for Bishop Williamson to protect their interests.
If Bishop Fellay interprets Vatican Council II with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism he will be considered anti-Semitic. So he he is now avoiding it.
Instead he is willing to reach an agreement with Rome in which Vatican Council II will continue to be interpreted with an irrational premise to produce a non traditional conclusion.
For political reasons he is not going to interpret Vatican Council II without the irrational premise since it would be saying the Council does not contradict the rigorist interpretation of EENS. He would not want to be dubbed a Feeneyite.-Lionel Andrades

http://www.la-croix.com/Religion/Pape/INTERVIEW-Pope-Francis-2016-05-17-1200760633
http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/sspxs-bishop-fellay-little-by-little-rome-is-giving-us-all-we-need-for-reco/

No comments: