For me 'the dogma of the faith' has not been lost, as it has been for Cardinal Muller. For me Vatican Council II is not a break with 'the dogma of the faith', as it is for the SSPX bishops.
I affirm 'the dogma of the faith', extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) as did the SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012.
Now Cardinal Muller, the U.S ACLA and SPLC would want the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II as a break with 'the dogma of the faith' which Our Lady mentioned at Fatima.
It is only if the SSPX accepts Vatican Council II as a break with 'the dogma of the faith', Pope Francis will be allowed to give the SSPX full canonical status.
The Vatican under pressure from the political Left wants the SSPX to accept a false doctrine, as has been done on such a wide scale by cardinals and bishops.
The issue is not Vatican Council II in itself but Vatican Council II as a break or in harmony with the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS. The issue really is Vatican Council II interpreted with Cushingism ( there are known exceptions, objective exceptions to EENS in the present times) or Feeneyism ( there are no known exceptions to EENS) .
So Catholics have a choice. They can assume LG 16 refers to an invisible or visible case.It is implicit or explicit.
According to Cardinal Muller the SSPX must accept Vatican Council II in which LG 16 is explicit and not implicit, it refers to a visible and not an invisible case, it is Cushingite and not Feeneyite.
If like me the SSPX says they accept Vatican Council II with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism, according to the CDF, politically inclined towards the Left- the SSPX could go ahead and accept Vatican Council II (Feeneyite)- but this would not be enough for canonical status.
Since the issue was always ecclesiology and ecclesiology is linked to EENS. The issue is not Vatican Council II which be interpreted with the new ecclesiology ( Cushingism) or the old ecclesiology ( Feeneyism).
If the Vatican interprets Vatican Council Ii with Feeneyism, it would be considered Anti-Semitic and the liberal rabbis will come out with their legal demands.So to keep the peace, Cardinal Muller would want the SSPX to interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism.
Meanwhile if the SSPX does not accept Vatican Council II, with Cushingism or Feeneyism, the Jewish left media will label them as being schismatic, a cult etc and demand that they be banned.
If the SSPX accepts Vatican Council II they will be directly under a pope who is pro-Left and the Left we know is pro-Satan.
I affirm Vatican Council II with Feeneyism but I am an ordinary layman in Rome and it doesn't make a difference, for any one.
If the SSPX affirms Vatican Council II with Feeneyism, at least Cardinal Muller cannot say that the SSPX does not accept Vatican Council II.Instead it is the SSPX which will be in a position to ask Cardinal Muller to accept Vatican Council , which he does not.
From my perspective it is Cardinal Muller and the SSPX, who do not accept Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).
-Lionel Andrades
If like me the SSPX says they accept Vatican Council II with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism, according to the CDF, politically inclined towards the Left- the SSPX could go ahead and accept Vatican Council II (Feeneyite)- but this would not be enough for canonical status.
Since the issue was always ecclesiology and ecclesiology is linked to EENS. The issue is not Vatican Council II which be interpreted with the new ecclesiology ( Cushingism) or the old ecclesiology ( Feeneyism).
If the Vatican interprets Vatican Council Ii with Feeneyism, it would be considered Anti-Semitic and the liberal rabbis will come out with their legal demands.So to keep the peace, Cardinal Muller would want the SSPX to interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism.
Meanwhile if the SSPX does not accept Vatican Council II, with Cushingism or Feeneyism, the Jewish left media will label them as being schismatic, a cult etc and demand that they be banned.
If the SSPX accepts Vatican Council II they will be directly under a pope who is pro-Left and the Left we know is pro-Satan.
I affirm Vatican Council II with Feeneyism but I am an ordinary layman in Rome and it doesn't make a difference, for any one.
If the SSPX affirms Vatican Council II with Feeneyism, at least Cardinal Muller cannot say that the SSPX does not accept Vatican Council II.Instead it is the SSPX which will be in a position to ask Cardinal Muller to accept Vatican Council , which he does not.
From my perspective it is Cardinal Muller and the SSPX, who do not accept Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment