Bishop Fellay and the SSPX Superiors know that there was a mistake in the Fr.Leonard Feeney case when hypothetical cases ( baptism of desire etc) were wrongly assumed to be objective exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Catholic Church.Yet they will not support the Feeneyite interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).They do not want to be called Feeneyites.
They removed Bishop Williamson and other SSPX priests from the SSPX, who were not willing to accept the Jewish Left doctrines and theology approved for the Catholic Church and also the politically acceptable figure of the Holocaust deaths.
Bishop Fellay also did not criticize the recent Vatican Document on inter religious dialogue with the Jews. It said Jews do not need to convert into the Catholic Church.It
also approved a new theology for Catholics.
In the recent interview with the National Catholic Register he mentioned that the SSPX has all these years survived.It avoided falling into the abysss on the left or the right ( see video).So to not fall into the abyss, not to be prohibited by the Left, Bishop Fellay is not saying hypothetical cases cannot be exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of EENS.For the sake of security and the future of the SSPX he does not want to affirm traditional Feeneyism as a theology.Instead he will use the slogan Pope Pius XII condemned Fr.Leonard Feeney. Since this is acceptable to the Masons.
He is now about to sign a document accepting Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston, interpreting hypothetical cases as referring to seen in the flesh people in 2016.He will expediently confuse what is invisible as being visible.For him what is obviously implicit would be explicit and he will mix up what is subjective as being objective.
Nor does he comment on the persecution of the traditionalists who do not deny that they are Feeneyites, with respect to the interpretation of EENS.
It has been noticed that for the last few years the communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA, have not held an annual conference on the subject of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.They have probably got a warning from an external source. No Catholic organisation has been able to organise a conference on extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
So Bishop Fellay understands.
He does not want to say that the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made an objective mistake and there are no known exceptions to the traditional Feeneyite interpretation of EENS.
When Vatican Council II mentions being saved invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire with reference to EENS (AG 7, LG 14)it was a mistake.This is an objective error.Hypothetical cases have nothing to do with all needing to be formal members of the Church, all needing 'faith and baptism' for salvation.
There is also no comment from the SSPX on the General Chapter Statement 2012 which was never addressed or supported by the CDF/Ecclesia Dei.Possibly it was unthinkable for the politically correct cardinals and bishops at the CDF.-Lionel Andrades
also approved a new theology for Catholics.
In the recent interview with the National Catholic Register he mentioned that the SSPX has all these years survived.It avoided falling into the abysss on the left or the right ( see video).So to not fall into the abyss, not to be prohibited by the Left, Bishop Fellay is not saying hypothetical cases cannot be exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of EENS.For the sake of security and the future of the SSPX he does not want to affirm traditional Feeneyism as a theology.Instead he will use the slogan Pope Pius XII condemned Fr.Leonard Feeney. Since this is acceptable to the Masons.
He is now about to sign a document accepting Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston, interpreting hypothetical cases as referring to seen in the flesh people in 2016.He will expediently confuse what is invisible as being visible.For him what is obviously implicit would be explicit and he will mix up what is subjective as being objective.
Nor does he comment on the persecution of the traditionalists who do not deny that they are Feeneyites, with respect to the interpretation of EENS.
It has been noticed that for the last few years the communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA, have not held an annual conference on the subject of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.They have probably got a warning from an external source. No Catholic organisation has been able to organise a conference on extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
So Bishop Fellay understands.
He does not want to say that the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made an objective mistake and there are no known exceptions to the traditional Feeneyite interpretation of EENS.
When Vatican Council II mentions being saved invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire with reference to EENS (AG 7, LG 14)it was a mistake.This is an objective error.Hypothetical cases have nothing to do with all needing to be formal members of the Church, all needing 'faith and baptism' for salvation.
There is also no comment from the SSPX on the General Chapter Statement 2012 which was never addressed or supported by the CDF/Ecclesia Dei.Possibly it was unthinkable for the politically correct cardinals and bishops at the CDF.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment