The present two popes are heretical and non traditional since they interpret EENS and Vatican Council II with Cushingism. So Vatican Council II (Cushingite) emerges as a break with EENS ( Feeneyite).

Heresy, Schism and Apostasy  (EWTN)

DefinitionsThe Catechism of the Catholic Church defines these  three sins against the faith in this way: 2089 Incredulity is the neglect of revealed truth or the willful refusal to assent to it.    Lionel: The dogma extra ecclesiam  nulla  salus (EENS) as  it was known  in  the 16th century and previous  centuries  is rejected according to  Pope Benedict in a recent  interview with Avvenire. The dogma was revealed truth  based on John 3:5 and Mark 16:16. __________________________ "Heresy is the obstinate post-baptismal denial of  some truth which must be believed with divine and catholic faith, or it is likewise an obstinate doubt  concerning the same;  Lionel: Pope Benedict has  refused to affirm the  dogma EENS as it was  interpreted over the  centuries. ____________________________ apostasy is the total repudiation of the Christian faith;  schism is the refusal of submission to the Roman   Pontiff or of communion with the members of the Church subject to him." [Code of Canon Law c.751] The Church's moral theology has always distinguished  between objective ormaterial sin and formal sin.  Lionel: The moral theology  of the Church before  and after the Council of  Trent is not the same. _________________________ The person who holds something contrary to the Catholic  faith is materially a heretic.  Lionel: Since the dogma EENS is  no more  affirmed by  the contemporary magisterium  it is the Catholic faith which  has been changed. It is members of the  magisterium who are in  heresy. _______________________   They possess the matter of heresy, theological error.  Lionel: The contemporary  magisterium uses an  irrational premise and  inference to create a  new  theology, which  is a break with the  pre-Council  of Trent  magisterium. This is heresy. _______________________ Thus, prior to the Second Vatican Council it was quite  common to speak of non-Catholic Christians as  heretics, since many of their doctrines are objectively  contrary to Catholic teaching.  Lionel: They were heretics  according to the old  ecclesiology  based  on the dogma EENS. ________________________ This theological distinction remains true, though  in keeping with the pastoral charity of the Council  today we use the term heretic only to describe those  who willingly embrace what they know to be  contrary to revealed truth. Such persons are formally  (in their conscience before God) guilty of heresy. Thus,  the person who is objectively in heresy is not formally  guilty of heresy if 1) their ignorance of the truth is due  to their upbringing in a particular religious tradition (to  which they may even be scrupulously faithful), and 2)  they are not morally responsible for their ignorance  of the truth. This is the principle of invincible  ignorance, which Catholic theology has always  recognized as excusing before God. Lionel: The concept of invincible  ignorance in the new theology  is based on the use of an  irrational premise and inference  to create  a non traditional  and heretical outcome. The concept of invincible  ignorance is heretical.It is  an irrationality used to reject  the dogma EENS. _________________________ The same is true of apostasy. The person who leaves  not just the Catholic Church but who abandons Christ  Himself is materially an apostate. He is formally an  apostate through willful, and therefore culpable,  repudiation of the Christian faith. Finally, the person who refuses submission to  the Roman Pontiff, whom Vatican I defined as  having a universal primacy of authority over the  whole Church, is at least a material schismatic. Lionel: Presently we have Pope  Benedict and Pope Francis  rejecting the dogma EENS as  it was accepted by the  popes over the centuries. They also interpret Vatican  Council II with  irrational  Cushingism instead of rational  and  traditional Feeneyism  which is  still an option  which they reject. They use the same irrational  premise and inference to  suggest that there are known  exceptions in moral  theology, to the traditional  teaching on mortal sin  and Hell.In other words,  they know of people  who are living in manifest  sin but will not be going to  Hell. So now the primacy of  authority is there with  popes in public heresy. ____________________________  It was thus common in the past to speak  of the schismatic Orthodox Churches who broke  with Rome in 1054. As with heresy, we no  longer assume the moral culpability of those who  belong to Churches in schism from Rome, and  thus no long refer to them as schismatics. Lionel: They are no longer  referred to as schismatics  since the popes today no  more affirm the dogma EENS as did the popes  over the centuries. __________________________ Excommunication When it comes to Catholics who are formally  guilty of heresy, apostasy or schism, the  Church applies the penalty of excommunication.  The 1983 Code of Canon Law,repeating  the sanctions of the earlier 1917 Code, states, c. 1364 1. With due regard for can. 194, part 1, n. 2, an  apostate from the faith, a heretic or a schismatic  incurs automatic (latae sententiae) excommunication  and if a cleric, he can also be punished by the  penalties mentioned in can. 1336, part 1, nn. 1, 2,  and 3. Lionel: When Pope Benedict  XVI does not  affirm  the dogma EENS according  to traditional Feeneyism it is  heresy. When he interprets  the dogma EENS with irrational Cushingism, it is heresy. When Pope Francis states in Amoris Laeitiae  '  Hence it is (sic) can no longer simply be  said that all those in any “irregular” situation  are living in a state of mortal sin and are  deprived of sanctifying grace." (#301).',  this is heresy. He cannot know anyone who is living in concubinage or  adultery who will not go  to Hell and so will be an  exception to traditional  moral teachings. ___________________________ 2. If long lasting contumacy or the seriousness  of scandal warrants it, other penalties can be  added including dismissal from the clerical state.  This canon is saying that once a person  willingly repudiates Christ, embraces a heresy,  knowing it to be contrary to divine and Catholic  faith, or refuses submission to the Roman Pontiff  (or communion with the members of the Church  subject to him), by virtue of the law itself  they are automatically excommunicated. No  ecclesiastical act is necessary and  no public  notice...  Lionel: This would be saying  that our popes, cardinals and  bishops are automatically  excommunicated since  they interpret EENS  with  Cushingism and not as the   popes over the centuries,  before the Council of Trent. _____________________________   The Special Danger of Ultra-Traditionalist  Movements There is within the Church today a special  danger for those who, often for seemingly  legitimate reasons (abuses of the liturgy,  the open promotion of heresy even by  clergy, and similar causes), have sought  refuge in traditionalist movements on the  margins of the Church. These groups,  distinguishable from those who love the  Tridentine tradition of the Mass and  sacraments and who celebrate them in  Communion with the Pope, go their  own way outside of the laws of the Church.  They typically rationalize their  disobedience by attacking  the  Second Vatican Council, the current  liturgical rites, ecumenical and  interreligious dialogue, and often  Pope John Paul II personally, never  distinguishing between teaching and  law on the one hand, and the abuse  of it by dissenters and the disobedient  on the other.  Lionel: Archbishop Marcel  Lefebvre was protesting  against a Vatican Council  II interpreted with  Cushingism as a theology. He was not aware that  Vatican Council II could  also be interpreted  with Feeneyism.The  CDF did not inform  him.He was correct.  Vatican Council  II interpreted with a  false premise and  inference (Cushingism)  results in a non  traditional and heretical  conclusion. He was excommunicated by the CDF Prefect,  Cardinal Raztzinger. It was the responsibility of the CDF Prefect  to show him the option. __________________________________   These groups, such as the Society of St. Pius X,  of Pius V, the "We Resist You to Your Face"  movement, Br. Dimond and Holy Family  Monastery, make ready use of scandals to  gain support among the unwary, who,  discouraged by their local situation,  may think they are joining a more  perfect orthodoxy and a more loyal  remnant of Catholics.  Lionel:They are protesting  against a Vatican Council II  interpreted with Cushingism  i.e there are known  exceptions to the dogma  EENS. If the contemporary  Magisterium would interpret  Vatican Council II  with Feeneyism, the  traditionalists  could change their present view of  the Council. ______________________________________ Thankfully such motives may excuse  the average person who takes comfort  in such groups, at least initially, though  as St. Thomas Aquinas teaches to take  scandal in other's sins is itself sinful.  However, there is a great danger that  starting from the material schism of  refusing submission to the Pope, that  all these groups have in common, the  Catholic cannot long maintain the  schizophrenic position of saying  they are being submissive to the  Pope while disobeying him. At  some point they must choose  and formally adhere to the schism  of the group. In some cases the  group identity depends on some  formal repudiation of the "Novus  Ordo" Church, very effectively  hastening the spiritual demise of  the lay adherent.  Lionel: Today we have  two popes who interpret  the dogma EENS  with Cushingism and  not Feeneyism.  Pope Benedict in the  interview with Avvenire lamented over the lost of  the faith and the dogma  EENS according to the  16th century missionaries ( who used the theology  of Feeneyism).Inspite  of his disappointment,  he would not affirm EENS  in that interview,  with the Feeneyite  theology. __________________________________ Also unfortunate for such souls  is the fact that these ultra-traditionalist  groups profess to be doctrinally orthodox,   an orthodoxy which necessarily includes  the teaching that Outside the Church  There Is No Salvation. Lionel: They say they  affirm EENS but most  of them interpret EENS  with Cushingism. The traditionalists  Slaves of the Immaculate  Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Centers,  USA are an exception. _______________________________________  This means that someone who has formally  separated himself from the Church through  heresy or schism, or knowing the Church  to be true failed to enter her, cannot  be saved, unless of course they renounce  their own will and reconcile with the Church. Lionel: Apparantly EWTN here  considers all the traditionalists  as affirming EENS according  to Feeneyism which is  considered heretical. While EWTN interprets  EENS with Cushingism and  considers this magisterial. _______________________________________  Unlike the non-Catholic Christian,  can the super-orthodox claim invincible  ignorance of this teaching?  Lionel: The contemporary  magisterium can make  things clear for all.They  could clarify that EENS can  be interpreted with or  without an irrational premise  and inference, with Cushingism  or Feeneyism. They can make  the same distinction for Vatican  Council II. Perhaps Pope Francis realizes  that the magisterium made a  mistake in the interpretation  of Vatican Council  II ( Cushingism). So now he  is inviting the SSPX into  the Church with Vatican  Council II not being an issue. He also needs to apologize  for the excommunication  of Archbishop Lefevbre  who was rejecting a  Cushingite Vatican Council  II. He could also  apologize for the Holy  Office(1949) excommunicating  Fr.Leonard Feeney  for rejecting a Cushingite  EENS. _______________________________________ Can they escape the condemnation of  Pope Boniface VIII, who in first elaborating  it said, "this authority, although it is given  to man and is exercised by man, is not  human, but rather divine, and has been  given by the divine Word to Peter himself  and to his successors in him, whom the  Lord acknowledged an established rock,  when he said to Peter himself:  Whatsoever you shall bind etc. [Matt. 16:19].  Therefore, whosoever resists this power so  ordained by God, resists the order of God ...?  Lionel: Pope Boniface VIII  approved the dogma  extra ecclesiam nulla salus in the Council of  Florence 1441.It was  Feeneyite!.It is being  rejected by EWTN today. ______________________________________________________  No wonder that given enough time such  groups inevitably produce those who claim  that the See of Peter is vacant, since the logic  of their schismatic attitude is ultimately  irreconcilable with the doctrine of papal  primacy, as enunciated by both Pope  Boniface and Vatican I. Lionel: Pope Boniface and  the pope and cardinals  at Vatican 1 were Feeneyite  on EENS.The present two popes are heretical  and non traditional since  they interpret EENS  and Vatican Council II with  Cushingism. So Vatican  Council II (Cushingite)  emerges as a break  with EENS ( Feeneyite). -Lionel Andrades https://www.ewtn.com/expert/answers/heresy_schism_apostasy.htm Pope Benedict's Avvenire interview contradicts  the SSPX General Chapter Statement on  extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican  Council II http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/pope-benedicts-avvenire-interview.html For there to be an exception to EENS it  would mean there is a known case, a  physically known case in the present  times, who made it to Heaven  without the baptism of water.An  invisible case cannot be an exception. http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/03/for-there-to-be-exception-to-eens-it.html Heresy in Amoris Latitiae ? http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/heresy-in-amoris-latitiae.html