Cardinal Schonborn must be told that there are no known cases of someone saved outside the Church

• Comment from the blog 1Peter5 :  

  What Does the Choice of Exhortation 

• Presenters Tell Us?

• 
• 
  
• 
  
• He (Cardinal Schonborn) drew an analogy with Lumen 
  
  
  In the same way, he suggested, there may be virtues and 
• Gentium,truth in relationships that fall short of the Church’s
•  full vision of marriage as a permanent, lifelong union between
•  a man  a document of the Second Vatican Council (1962-65),
•  which taught that there are “elements of sanctification 
• and of truth” outside the visible boundaries of the Catholic
•  Church.

• Lionel: 
• He is referring to Lumen Gentium 8 which says
•  there are 'elements of sanctification and truth' 
• in other religions. Cardinal Schonborn like Cardinal 
• Ratzinger infers that LG 8 refers not to invisible for 
• us cases, but personally known people ,saved without
•  the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. So LG 
• 8 for them contradicts and rejects the dogma extra 
• ecclesiam nulla salus. From here we get Pope Benedict's
•  'development of doctrine' on EENS.
  Cardinal Schonborn is implying that if the Church's 
• teaching on extra ecclesiam nulla salus can be changed 
• with LG 8 then why not change other teachings of the 
• Church.
  Their entire new theology is based on mixing up what 
• is invisible as being visible and they get away with it.
  It is important for us to affirm LG 8, LG 16, UR 3, NA 
• 2 etc as being invisible cases. They are hypothetical 
• cases. So they cannot be an exception in 2016 to the 
• 16th century missionaries interpretation of the dogma 
• extra ecclesiam nulla salus.We cannot know of any 
• hypothetical case which is objectively visible.
  We must affirm that there is nothing in Vatican Council
•  II ( including hypothetical LG 14) which contradicts
•  extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
• -Lionel Andrades

http://www.onepeterfive.com/what-does-the-choice-of-exhortation-presenters-tell-us/