Why is Sanborn and Cekada using the Rahner-Ratzinger new theology?

Why are the sedevacantists Bishop Donald  Sanborn and Fr. Anthony Cekada using the Rahner-Ratzinger new theology ? 

The new theology is based on known salvation outside the Church.It's foundation is assuming hypothetical cases are objective on earth.It is based on being able to physically see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water.It assumes cases of the baptism of desire are known and visible not only to God-but also to man!.It assumes there are known cases of people saved in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water.It is upon all this irrationality that the new theology was supported by the theologians Rahner and Ratzinger.1

At the sedevancantist seminary in Florida,USA  they assume that the baptism of desire is relevant to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). In other words it refers to known cases.This is the Rahner-Ratzinger new theology.

Suppose they considered the baptism of desire as being known only to God and invisble in personal cases for us human beings, then it would not be relevant or an exception to EENS. Then there would also not be any exception in Vatican Council II (LG 16 etc) to the dogma EENS according to the 16 th centuries that Pope Benedict recently referred to.

What are traditionalist sedevacantist Catholics doing? Why are they supporting the theology of the liberals?-Lionel Andrades

1

You can interpret Vatican Council II without the new theology. Try it and see

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/03/you-can-interpret-vatican-council-ii.html

Sedevacantist Most Holy Trinity Seminary Fl. since Oct. 10, 2015 does not clarify if in Vatican Council II (LG 16, LG 8) refers to persons visible or invisible.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/11/sedevacantist-most-holy-trinity.html