"Thanks for providing this! God bless the Society!", " I agree with much of what Lionel says"

Comments On: Musings of a Pertinacious Papist

Lionel:

MARCH 27, 2016

Card. Ratzinger interpreted Vatican Council II with an irrationality when a rational option was available .He then excommunicated Abp. Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops for not accepting this heretical version of the faith

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/03/card-ratzinger-interpreted-vatican.html

Blogger Mark Citadel said...

Thanks for providing this! God bless the Society!

Anonymous Chuck Martelowski said...

Does not the fact that 1962 came thirteen years after the Cushing letter indicate that the vibrating theological heads of the Great Council were already well convinced of "known salvation," whether or not it contradicted the long established doctrine of EENS? It is not rational to argue that V2 makes perfect -- and perfectly traditional -- sense, if only we do Lionel's "I Dream of Jeannie" head gazoink. It forces one to argue that the intent of the authors plays no role in interpreting what they wrote. In fact, EENS had to go if the agenda of the V2 theologians was to move forward with the business of "profoundly evolving" the Church to the requirements of the zeitgeist. In other words, if the Cushing letter had not existed, it would have been necessary for the V2 conspirators to invent it.

I agree with much of what Lionel says, and in any case do not intend to turn this thread into a cheap suit of back-and-forth argle-bargle.

Lionel:

The excommunication of Archbishop Lefebvre by the CDF Prefect, like that of Fr.Leonard Feeney by the Holy Office (CDF) in 1949, was an injustice.There was no known salvation outside the Church

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/03/the-excommunication-of-archbishop.html

-L.A

https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6312447&postID=2702835882696222549