Comment from the blog Musings of a Pertinacious Papist
Is not the theology taught by Dr. Lamont in Australia approved by the Masons ? It has the approval of the Jewish Left and so he retains the mandatum to teach theology ?
He uses an irrationality to interpret Vatican Council II and assumes hypothetical cases mentioned in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, are objective exceptions to the tradtional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
I have mentioned this many times on my blog. I have also specifically mentioned Dr. John Lamont by name. He has nevr denied what I have written or commented upon it.
I have mentioned this many times on my blog. I have also specifically mentioned Dr. John Lamont by name. He has nevr denied what I have written or commented upon it.
If he would interpret Vatican Council II WITHOUT the irrational premise and inference then the Council would not be a break with the dogma EENS and it would be traditional. There ecclesiology would be exclusivist.However if Dr.Lamont affirmed this Vatican Council II which would be traditional and non irrational, would he not lose his mandatume to teach theology.He would be blacklisted by the Vatican?
John Lamont, Thomas Pink, Joseph Shaw remain politically correct and keep their mandatum to teach theology
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/04/john-lamont-thomas-pink-joseph-shaw.html
Bishop Frank Dewane of Venice, Fla,USA gives the mandatum to teach apparition theology and a new false doctrine approved by the CDF
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/bishop-frank-dewane-of-venice-flausa.html
-Lionel Andrades
http://pblosser.blogspot.it/2016/03/liberte-egalite-fraternite-frenchmans.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment