He is referring to a speculative case. If in the mind of Pius X this is an explicit case, then it would mean the pope made an objective error. He has confused what is invisible as being visible.
As the Catechism of St. Pius X says (article 9, question 29):
Q. But if a man through no fault of his own is outside the Church, can he be saved?
A. If he is outside the Church through no fault of his, that is, if he is in good faith, and if he has received Baptism, or at least has the implicit desire of Baptism; and if, moreover, he sincerely seeks the truth and does God's will as best he can; such a man is indeed separated from the body of the Church, but is united to the soul of the Church and consequently is on the way of salvation
Lionel: He is referring to a speculative case. If in the mind of Pius X this is an explicit case, then it would mean the pope made an objective error. He has confused what is invisible as being visible.
This confusion is central to the Rahner-Ratzinger new theology.It is based on this irrationality that Pope Benedict says there is a development of doctrine.For him LG 16 would refer to an explicit case.So only then would Vatican Council II contradict the dogmaextra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the Council of Florence.1
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment