Wednesday, March 2, 2016

Archbishop Pozzo must not change the teachings of the Church to please his superiors

Archbishop Pozzo must not  change the teachings of the Church to please his superiors.Pope Benedict XVI allowed the theological corruption to remain when he could have eliminated  it. He then chose people to be nominated on the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith who would not be whistleblowers and would allow the irrational observation which is the basis of the new theology, to remain.
Now Archbishop Pozzo and the Pope Francis want the SSPX to come into the Church accepting the false innterpretation of Vatican Council II, the Nicene Creed, the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and the Baltimore Catechism.1

He makes the following doctrinal error in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and the SSPX has to accept it for canonical status.

1) Being saved with the baptism of desire(BOD)  or in invincible ignorance(I.I) , as mentioned in the Letter of the Holy Office and in Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) refer to explicit cases cases for him. He does not deny this. 
BOD and I.I should not have been mentioned in Vatican Council II since they are invisible cases for us.They are not relevant or exceptions to the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).This was a mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which assumed these cases were objectively known and so were exceptions to the Feneeyite interpretation of EENS.
So they were mentioned in Vatican Council II and this is not a mistake for Archbishop Pozzo.
2) Since the Lettter of the Holy Office assumed being saved in invincible ignorance referrred to known cases, these 'known' cases, became objective exceptions to the traditional Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS.So every one did not any more need  to enter the Church but only those who 'knew',who were not in invincible ignorance.This new doctrine in LG 14, AG 7 contradicts the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS. It also contradicts the orthodox passages in  Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) which support the dogma EENS.Archbishop Pozzo accepts all this and does not consider it a doctrinal error.
Neither does he interpret BOD and I.I as referring to invisible cases and so they are not exceptions to the dogma EENS. So really there is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict the 'strict interpretation of EENS.He will not make this doctrinal claim.
3) The SSPX like Archbishop Pozzo  has to continue to interpret Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) as referring to explicit cases and so Vatican Council becomes a break with the dogma EENS.-Lionel Andrades




1

Abp. Guido Pozzo wants the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II with heresy

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/03/abppozzo-wants-sspx-to-accept-vatican.html

No comments: