Bishop Schneider let us know what you believe on exclusive salvation. You are a shepherd.

It's incredible how a conservative bishop in our times chooses the Left Path, the path of Satan, that of the political Left. Bishop Athanasius Schneider is not affirming the Faith in public by contradicting the Vatican Document on the Jews, nor is he affirming the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, with  the 'rigorist interpretation'.He is also supporting the Left when he interprets Vatican Council II with an irrationality, with Cushingism, instead of traditional Feeneyism.
May be he's just ignorant or may be he is doing this to maintain his 'canonical status'.
He supports the traditionalists but offers the Novus Ordo Mass with the new ecclesiology, which is heretical and supported by the Freemasons.The ecclesiology is irrational and not Catholic.
For him peace and security takes a priority over saying "all non Catholics are on the way to Hell according to Vatican Council II , the Catechism of the Catholic Church 1992 and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS)."He cannot say in public "every one needs to be a card carrying member of the Church to avoid Hell in 2016 according to Vatican Council II etc". He will not publically affirm the old exclusivist ecclesiology on salvation.
He will avoid saying  all non Catholics, Jews included, need to convert formally into the Catholic Church to avoid Hell and that this is the teaching of the Church, according to Vatican Council II,  which the present magisterium is rejecting.
He is not willing to 'sacrifice' his career, yet he wants the laity to make the sacrifice, may be lose their jobs and reputation, while proclaiming exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
The dogma of the faith has clearly been lost as Our Lady observed at Fatima.
Even New Catholic the editor at Rorate Caeili chooses 'safe subjects'  in interviews.He will prudently maintain the Leftist lies on Vatican Council II. Since he is not going to project the Council as being in harmony with the Feeneyite version of the dogma EENS.
In the past the SSPX bishops would call for  the conversion of non Catholics, but now there was not a whimper when the Vatican Document on the theology accepted and demanded  by the Jewish Left, was proclaimed by a fearful and corrupt magisterium.Bishop Fellay too has come in line.The SSPX wants to build its new seminary in the USA ,in which they will teach the politically accepted teachings, of the Left, who represent Satan.
When the traditionalist leaders, shepherds, do not oppose the wolf, they are abetting in the danger to an innocent flock.They are supporting the lies.They are not speaking the truth,only, to avoid living on the streets.Not a single cardinal or bishop is saying Vatican Council II is Feeneyite, it is pro-St.Robert Bellarmine on exclusive salvation. They do not want to be harassed. They do not want the experiences of Bishop Richard Williamson and Robert Sungenis.

 

FOR ME

For me there are no known cases of the baptism of desire.For Bishop Schneider there are such cases.

For me the baptism of desire and blood are not exceptions to the dogma EENS. For Bishop Schneider they are.

For me references to salvation, in Vatican Council II are hypothetical  and known only to God in personal cases.For the bishop they refer to explicit cases.

For me Vatican  Council II (AG 7, LG 14) is in agreement  with the rigorist intepretation of the dogma EENS. Bishop Schneider does not say anything on this subject.

For me Nostra Aetate 4 says Catholics are the new people of God, the Church is the new people of God, they are the Elect. They are the new Chosen People.Outside the Church there is no salvation (NA 4, AG 7, LG 14).

The Jews were the elect but they rejected the Messiah, do not have the Temple and the Sacrifice and are dominated by the Jewish Left which promote pro-Satanic things( pornography, abortion,Sodom and Gomorrah...).

For me Vatican Council II says most people are on the way to Hell, since they die without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7, LG 14). There is no comment from Bishop Schneider on this subject.

For me the CDF Notification on Fr. Jaques Dupuis S.J during the pontificate of Pope John Paul II contradicts the name and teachings of the Department for the Theology of Religions at the Pontifical Gregorian University, Rome.There is no comment from any one on this subject.

Satan, through the political Left is increasing his domination over society and is now extending it within the Church.Bishop Schneider and the others say nothing on the subject of exclusive salvation.

Speak the truth with love if you must but at least speak it.

The interviews he gives to Rorate Caeili and others are vague and general  they do not touch the subject of exclusive salvation, the exclusivist ecclesiology.If he affirms exclusive salvation in the Church he would be opposed by the magisterium and the SSPX. So they tell us lay Catholics who do not have a theology degree, that there are known cases of people in Heaven in 2016 saved without the baptism of water.

They tell us they know of specific cases, seen in the flesh cases,  who were saved without the baptism of water, they were saved outside the Church. So there is salvation outside the Catholic Church. Hypothethical cases are defacto and practically known.Someone saw St.Emerentiana go to Heaven without the baptism of water.Possibly he was an American at Baltimore or Boston.

Every one is comfortable with all this nonsense.

Why does Bishop Athanasius Schneider not use these interviews  to make a direct statement. Let us know what you believe bishop.You are a shepherd!

Affirm exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.-Lionel Andrades

 Bishop Schneider like Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and SSPX bishops and priests confuses what is invisible as being visible.Card. Gerhard Muller and Pope Francis do the same.So Vatican Council II becomes a break with the past
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/02/bishop-schneider-like-archbishop-marcel.html