Thursday, October 1, 2015

Lega Nord Roma : Per Angelo, 69 anni di Roma, non c'è posto in albergo, per migliaia di clandestini, magari ventenni, invece sì.



Lega Nord ROMA ha condiviso il video di Matteo Salvini.
18 h































Per Angelo, 69 anni di Roma, non c'è posto in albergo, per migliaia di clandestini, magari ventenni, invece sì.
Ascoltate e CONDIVIDETE le sue parole... Anche per lui sono pronte le accuse di razzismo?

https://it-it.facebook.com/leganordroma

Francia Non celebrò un matrimonio gay: cinque mesi di carcere alla vicesindaco musulmana


SOLIDARIETA' a ! Svegliamoci, prima che ci mandino TUTTI nelle catacombe!

Roberto Fiore: "Una manifestazione contro la teoria del gender"

Mia intervista a Lafedequotidiana.it
"Noi siamo disponibili a dialogare politicamente con chiunque si riconosca nelle nostre battaglie e non abbiamo preclusioni, purché si discuta sulla base dei nostri principi e valori. La strategia politica è opinabile, i principi no".
Il leader di Forza Nuova Roberto Fiore attacca il governo Renzi.
LAFEDEQUOTIDIANA.IT|DI MICHELE M IPPOLITO

https://www.facebook.com/Roberto-Fiore-702795233100895/timeline/

Pope Paul VI should not have allowed the Cushing heresy in Vatican Council II


Immagine correlata


Pope Paul VI was  not aware of the magisterial heresy.He permitted it in Vatican Council II. There should have been no mention of baptism of desire(BOD) or invincible ignorance in Vatican Council II. Since they are not explicit and so are not relevant to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
The concept of salvation in Heaven being explicit on earth was accepted by Pope Paul VI and Pope John XXIII.
 We may speculate that someone in Heaven is there without the baptism of water but for this case to be an exception to the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS it would have to be explicit, objectively seen in 1960-1965.
Secondly how can we speculate that there are people in Heaven without the baptism of water when the dogma EENS says all need the baptism of water in the Catholic Church for salvation.Vatican Council II repeats the same teaching in Ad Gentes 7, Lumen Gentium 14 .
At the time of Vatican Council 2 (1960-1965) Pope Paul VI had still not lifted the excommunication of Fr. Leonard Feeney.
In an interview Fr. Leonard Feeney said that there was no known salvation outside the Church and the Jesuit Rector and Provincial were teaching that there was salvation outside  the Church and they were wrong.
It is a fact of life that we humans cannot know of cases in Heaven  saved with the baptism of water.
The saints including St. Francis Xaview have witnessed persons returning  from the dead only to be baptised with water. God did not send them to Hell but gave them  a second chance.
St. Thomas Aquinas said that God would send a preacher to the man in the forest in invincible ignorance who was to be saved.
No one in the Church can say that St. Emerentiana or another sent is in Heaven without  the baptism of water.
Yet there was confusion in the Church when the Baltimore Catechism(1808) speculated that the baptism of blood and desire were similar to the baptism of water.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church (1995) does not refer to the dogma any more but to an 'aphorism'.
There was no link between BOD, BOB and the baptism of water being necessary for salvation.The Baltimore Catechism made the link and then so did the Catechism of Pius X.
It is heresy (and irrationality) to suggest that BOD, BOB and I.I refer to explicit cases and so they are exceptions to EENS.
 This is the heresy of Cushingism. I avoid the Cushing Heresy in the interpretation of Vatican Councl II.
I affirm Ad Gentes 7 and  Lumen Gentium 14 in accord with the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS and I accept BOD, BOB and I.I as referring to invisible for us cases, which would be followed, in a manner known to God, with the baptism of water.(AG 7, LG 14)
So I do not reject BOD, BOB and I.I . I simply do not interpret it according to Cushingism but according to Fr. Leonard Feeney and Tradition.
The Cushing Heresy, which is not magisterial in 2015, emerged when the Archbishop of Boston, Richard Cushing  suppressed Fr.Leonard Feeney for political reasons.
The late Senator Edward Kennedy in his memoirs  wrote that he was present when his brother Robert phoned Archbishop Cushing and asked him to put a stop to Fr. Leonard Feeney's preching and teaching.
So he changed the original interpretation of the dogma with an irrationality. The irrationality was that BOD, BOB and I.I were explicit and so were relevant and exceptions to EENS. He then placed the references to BOD and I.I in Vatican Council II  and Pope Pius VI overlooked it.
-Lionel Andrades

Militia Christi and Forza Nuova are interpretating Vatican Council II with the pro-Left model.

Immagine correlataImmagine correlata
Militia Christi and Forza Nuova and other Catholic political parties in Italy are interpretating Vatican Council II with the pro-Left model. They are using Cushingism instead of Feeneyism to interpret Vatican Council II.
They are unaware of the Magisterial Heresy, which is pro-Left.The contemporary Magisterium of the Catholic Church has rejected the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) .They also interpret Vatican Council II as a break with EENS.
For the Catholic political organisations Forza Nuova and Militia Christi, there is only one known interpretation of Vatican Council II. It is with Cushingism. They are unaware that Vatican Council II can be interpretated in agreement with the strict interpretation.There is a choice.
If they reject the leftist model in the interpretation of Vatican Council II then there are political and social implications. The change comes with our Catholic religious beliefs.
Vatican Council II would then be in agreement with the 'perennial Magisterium' of the Church ( pre-1949) and they accept the perennial Magisterium.
This would be a rational interpretation of Vatican Council II while the leftist model would obviously be irrational and the stuff of fantasy.
Once they understand this they could then ask the Vatican and the Vicariates  to affirm Vatican Council II in agreement with the strict interpretation of EENS. Since this is rational and non heretical.
They would be saying that the Magisterium of the Catholic Church teaches before and after Vatican Council II that all non Catholics need to convert formally into the Church with faith and baptism to go to Heaven and avoid Hell.
Presently the political Left and the Catholic Magisterium state that all do not need to convert and they cite Vatican Council II. This is only a political slogan. Since the Council text is pro- Feeneyism while the Curia members are Cushingites.Vatican Council II is traditional on exclusive salvation in the Church Church. It affirms the old ecclesiology.
Why do Forza Nuova and Militia Christi have to accept the leftist model of Vatican Council II ?
According to Vatican Council II all Muslims need to convert with 'faith and baptism'(AG 7, LG 14) to go to Heaven.We do not know of any exception in 2015. According to Vatican Council II those who know about Jesus and the Church and yet do not enter are oriented to Hell. The Muslim prophet and his companions knew about the Church but chose not to enter.According to Vatican Council II  and the perennial Magisterium they were all oriented to Hell.
Similarly the Jewish Left leaders today need 'faith and baptism' for salvation. They are educated and they 'know ' about the Jewish Messiah.The Church which he founded is a continuation of the Jewish religion. They do not convert and so are oriented to Hell according to Vatican Council II.
Militia Christi and Forza Nuova need to proclaim this and watch how the Vatican Curia scramble for citations which are not there in Vatican Council II.
-Lionel Andrades


 
 

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf is in material heresy

Risultati immagini per Photo of Fr.John Zuhlsdorf with the pope and cardinals

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf recently wrote that the SSPX could be material/ de iure schism  and that their canonical position is 'ambigous'. He mentions ' the gravity of the material schism by which souls are at grave risk of not being saved for as long as the situation perdures.'.
Yes the SSPX would be in material schism for rejecting Vatican Council II if the criteria for the interpretation of the Council is Cushingism, the irrational premise and inference and the right hand column.(see tags for a definition of these terms)
If the irrational premise and inference was avoided, and if Feeneyism and the left hand column were used in the interpretation of Vatican Council II then Pope John Paul II, Pope Benedict XVI, Pope Francis and Fr. John Zuhlsdorf would be in material schism.They would be interpreting Vatican Council II as a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
I Lionel, affirm Vatican Council II interpreted without the irrational premise and inference and with Feeneyism and the left hand side column.
At the centre of Fr. Zuhlsdorf and my interpretation of Vatican Council II is EENS.He does not realize this.
For Fr.Z the popes cannot be heresy since he cannot conceive, perhaps, of magisterial heresy among the contemporary popes ( from Pius XII to Francis).
For me the contemporary Magisterium uses fantasy theology which is a break with the pre-1949 magisterium.So the Magisterium has to be wrong either before or after 1949.Any one who infers we can see and know people in Heaven in 2015 as we see and know people on earth has to be wrog. If a pope or cardinal implies this he is still wrong.
The SSPX says they affirm the perennial Magisterium of the Catholic Church. The perennial Magisterium ( before 1949) did not interpret the dogma EENS with Cushingism.
1.They did not assume salvation in Heaven is visible and known on earth for us human beings.
2. They did not assume that these 'visible cases' exclude the baptism of water.
3.They did not infer that these allegedly visible cases were explicit exceptions to all needing to be formal members of the Church with 'faith and baptism' for salvation.
For Fr.John Zuhlsdorf and the present Magisterium all these three errors ( 1,2,3) are there in their theology.
It is their position on Vatican Council II which is ambigous because of this irrationality of which they are not aware of.
 For the SSPX and for them, there would be no ambiguity if they interpreted all magisterial documents without irrational Cushingism and without the false premise and inference which creates a new theology.
There is no ambiguity then in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.
The ambiguity comes with Cushingism which is a new theology based on the irrationality of being able to see and know of non Catholics now in Heaven who are there without the baptism of water and Catholic Faith( the premise) and who are exceptions to the strict interpretation of EENS ( the inference).So all do not need to convert into the Church in the present times ( the false conclusion).
I have written about this in the past. Quite a few times and I have e-mailed and tweeted this to Fr.Z. He could comment on ' the gravity of the material schism (heresy) by which souls are at grave risk of not being saved for as long as the situation perdures.'.-Lionel Andrades


http://wdtprs.com/blog/2015/09/sspx-not-in-schism/