Friday, September 4, 2015



“Refugees” colonize a continent.

Approximately 104,460 asylum seekers arrived in Germany during the month of August, setting a new record. That makes 413,535 registered refugees and migrants coming to Germany in 2015 so far. The country expects a total of around 800,000 people to seek asylum in Germany this year. And that’s just Germany. The entire continent of Europe is being inundated with refugees at a rate unprecedented in world history. This is no longer just a “refugee crisis.” This is a hijrah.
Hijrah, or jihad by emigration, is, according to Islamic tradition, the migration or journey of Muhammad and his followers from Mecca to Yathrib, later renamed by him to Medina, in the year 622 CE. It was after the hijrah that Muhammad for the first time became not just a preacher of religious ideas, but a political and military leader. That was what occasioned his new “revelations” exhorting his followers to commit violence against unbelievers. Significantly, the Islamic calendar counts the hijrah, not Muhammad’s birth or the occasion of his first “revelation,” as the beginning of Islam, implying that Islam is not fully itself without a political and military component.
To emigrate in the cause of Allah – that is, to move to a new land in order to bring Islam there, is considered in Islam to be a highly meritorious act. “And whoever emigrates for the cause of Allah will find on the earth many locations and abundance,” says the Qur’an. “And whoever leaves his home as an emigrant to Allah and His Messenger and then death overtakes him, his reward has already become incumbent upon Allah. And Allah is ever Forgiving and Merciful.” (4:100) The exalted status of such emigrants led a British jihad group that won notoriety (and a shutdown by the government) a few years ago for celebrating 9/11 to call itself Al-Muhajiroun: The Emigrants.
And now a hijrah of a much greater magnitude is upon us. Evidence that this is a hijrah, not simply a humanitarian crisis, came last February, but was little noted at the time and almost immediately forgotten. The Islamic State published a document entitled, “Libya: The Strategic Gateway for the Islamic State.” Gateway into Europe, that is: the document exhorted Muslims to go to Libya and cross from there as refugees into Europe. This document tells would-be jihadis that weapons from Gaddafi’s arsenal are plentiful and easy to obtain in Libya – and that the country “has a long coast and looks upon the southern Crusader states, which can be reached with ease by even a rudimentary boat.”
The Islamic State did not have in mind just a few jihadis crossing from Libya: it also emerged last February that the jihadis planned to flood Europe with as many as 500,000 refugees. Now the number is shooting well beyond that in Germany alone. Of course, not all of these refugees are Islamic jihadis. Not all are even Muslims, although most are. However, no effort whatsoever is being made to determine the refugees’ adherence to Sharia and desire to bring it to their new land. Any such effort would be “Islamophobic.” Yet there are already hints that the Islamic State is putting its plan into effect: jihadis have already been found among the refugees trying to enter Europe. There will be many more such discoveries.
Eight hundred thousand Muslim refugees in one year alone. This will transform Germany, and Europe, forever, overtaxing the welfare economies of its wealthiest nations and altering the cultural landscape beyond recognition. Yet the serious public discussion that needs to be had about this crisis is shouted down by the usual nonsense: the Washington Post Wednesday published an inflammatory and irresponsible piece likening those concerned about this massive Muslim influx into Europe to 1930s Nazis ready to incinerate Jews by the millions. Hollywood star Emma Thompson accused British authorities of racism for not taking in more refugees – as if British authorities haven’t already done enough to destroy their nation.
And so it goes. If you don’t accept the brave new world that is sure to bring more jihad and more Sharia to Europe, you’re a Nazi and a racist. Meanwhile, no one is bothering even to ask, much less answer, one central question: why is it incumbent upon Europe have to absorb all these refugees? Why not Saudi Arabia or the other Muslim countries that are oil-rich and have plenty of space? The answer is unspoken because non-Muslim authorities refuse to believe it and Muslims don’t want it stated or known: these refugees have to go to Europe because this is a hijrah. 
This is also Europe’s death knell.

Why does the Commissar want Fr.Settimo Manelli F.I and Franciscans of the Immaculate to violate common sense and fundamental premises held by man ?

In conscience the Commissar of the Franciscans of the Immaculate cannot ask priests who offer only the Traditional Latin Mass(TLM) , to also offer the Novus Ordo Mass, with an irrational  and heretical new ecclesiology. They will object.They are not obliged to follow new theories and fantasy theology which could be the personal opinion of other religious , including the Commissar and Vatican cardinals.
 For example, they are not obliged to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), when there are no known exceptions to EENS in 2015 and neither can there ever be exceptions for us human beings.
Immagine correlata
So they are not obliged to say Vatican Council II mentions exceptions to EENS , when LG 16 etc cannot be explicit in our reality.
They must not be forced to create a new theology based on an irrational inference i.e LG 16, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to objectively known cases in our time (2015).
Even Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate(F.I) priests who offer only the Novus  Ordo Mass should not be expected to promote all this nonsense in the name of allegiance to the pope or something else.
 Similarly the F.I priests who offer only the TLM should not be asked to accept the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston which suggested that there was salvation outside the Church.Humanly speaking no one at that time could know of any one saved outside the Church.Neither were there any such cases known in pre-1949 times.
With this irrationality a new ecclesiology is created and the F.I priests are not obliged to follow it.
How can people in Heaven known only to God and saved with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance be exceptions on earth to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS. The Holy Office 1949 and the Archbishop of Boston clearly made a factual error.It is a fact of life that we cannot see or know people in Heaven.
This error was a break with the understanding of Church associated with the TLM before the Baltimore Catechism (1808)  was issued.
How could the Baltimore Catechism suggest 1) implicit desire for the baptism of water by a catechumenen who dies before receiving it and 2) martyrdom, were  baptisms, like the baptism of water? The baptism of water is seen and repeatable while the baptism of desire and blood cannot be given. They are unknown to us and known only to God.How can they be considered baptisms when they don't exist in our reality and we do not know of a single case.
Immagine correlata
So why must the Franciscans of the Immaculate who offer only the TLM  have to accept three known baptisms instead of one? The Nicene Creed says there is only one baptism.
 With all this irrationality making up the new ecclesiology the Franciscan priests along with Fr.Stefano Mannelli F.I, the founder of the community, will have to proclaim Jesus without the necessity of the Church for salvation( similar to the Protestants).They will have to proclaim the Kingdom of God without the necessity of Catholic Faith and the baptism of water(AG 7,LG 14). This is contrary to Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14 ) and the dogma  extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Immagine correlata
Why must Fr.Settimo Mannelli F.I, the former Rector of the seminary at Santa Maria di Nazareth, Boccea, which Pope Francis closed down,have to accept all this irrational reasoning and theology.All this is a new ecclesiology  and a break with the traditional ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.The traditional ecclesiology did not violate common sense and fundamental premises held by man, like, us not being able to see people in Heaven while we are on earth.-Lionel Andrades

It is un-ethical to knowingly have this taught to young seminarians of the Franciscans of the Immaculate

Immagine correlata

The Franciscans of the Immaculate seminarians at Tiburtina,Rome under the Commissar Fr.Sabino Ardito SDB have to interpret LG 16, LG 8, UR 3 etc in Vatican Council II as referring to explicit instead of implicit cases. They have to consider these cases as being visible instead of invisible for us in Rome in 2015. This is contrary to common sense.It is un-ethical to knowingly have this taught to young seminarians.
They may cite popes and catechisms but the end result is still the same - LG 16 ( invincible ignorance) cannot be visible instead of invisible, it cannot be an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
The Friars have not heard of the dogma EENS and they believe the baptism of desire  cases are visible in real life.
The political Left does not want the Church to teach the traditional exclusivist  salvation teachings but it cannot accomplish this goal, by having seminarians learn irrationality and nonsense as premises, on which to base their reasoning.
-Lionel Andrades

Pope Francis has still not given the Franciscans of the Immaculate seminarians a proper seminary building in Rome

Immagine correlata

I spent August at the church Santa Maria di Nazareth, Boccea,Rome helping the gardner Giovanni.This month re-starts my Italian lessons. So I may not be able to give the same amont of time at the church.
It was nice seeing the Friars the other day , pack themself in two wagons and go to Florence. It's three hours by road from Rome.They were back the same day from the community-house there.Among the friars who went to Florence were Italian and African seminarians.A few of the Franciscans of the Immaculate seminarians live here at Boccea while the rest of them live at Tibertina, Rome.
Pope Francis has still not given them a proper seminary building in Rome. 
In late October, I could have to change my residence and go to another parish.
-Lionel Andrades 

Pius X contributed to today's modernism on the salvation issue

We celebrated the feast day of Pope Saint Pius X, the great anti-modernist Pope who really contributed to modernism and heresy in the Catholic Church when he overlooked a statement made in the Baltimore Catechism of 1808.
The pope who gave us  Lamentabilli and Pascendi and the Oath Against Modernism overlooked the Baltimore Catechism suggesting that there were three baptisms and 1) being saved with implicit desire for the baptism of water for a catechumen who dies before receiving it and also 2) martyrdom, were baptisms like the baptism of water.
The baptism of desire(BOD) and the baptism of blood(BOB) were accepted in the Catechisms of  Pope Pius X and no one clarified that BOD and BOB were not visible and repeatable like the baptism of water. They could not be administered and they were unknown to us and known only to God. Also they could be followed by the baptism of water.He let the confusion persist.
BOD and BOB were not related to the Neccesity of the Baptism of Water for all. Yet in the Baltimore Catechism and then in the Catechism of Pope Pius X they were placed in the section on baptism.
We do not know any case of a person being saved without the baptism of water and they were placed in the baptism section as if they were relevant and were exceptions.
Modernists used this error to discard the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
The baptism of desire and blood were considered baptisms during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII and Fr.Leonard Feeney was not defended.This was the Holy Office 1949 promoting modernism.It was the magisterium which was teaching a new doctrine and heresy.
Then being saved in invincible ignorance and with implicit desire is mentioned in Vatican Council II (AG 7,LG 14).It is placed  along with orthodox passages which support the dogma saying all  need faith and baptism.Why was BOD,BOB and being saved in invincible ignorance  placed in Vatican Council II? Since it was assumed that these cases were explicit and so were exceptions to all needing the baptism of water for salvation.Invisible for us cases were considered to be explicit. This is an irrational premise. Then these explicit cases of BOD, BOB and I.I were inferred to be exceptions to all needing the baptism of water for salvation.
This is all modernism and it is magisterial today.Pius X like the other popes contributed to it.
-Lionel Andrades