Saturday, April 4, 2015

Happy Easter in the Catholic Church outside of which there is no known salvation

He Died and is Risen to save all from Hell,
all, who believe and trust in Him, 
and live His Teachings, in,
and according to the Catholic Church outside of which there is no salvation.
A holy and happy Easter to you,
in the only Ark of Noah that saves in the Flood.The Catholic Church His Mystical Body.

To save us from this he Died and is Risen.

A young Korean artist taken to Hell. Drew pictures of it.
The entrance it seems to me was similar to a very long and narrow alleyway, like an oven, low and dark and confined; the floor seemed to me to consist of dirty, muddy water emitting foul stench and swarming with putrid vermin...The bodily pains were so unbearable that though I had suffered excruciating ones in this life and according to what doctors say, the worst that can be suffered on earth for all my nerves were shrunken when I was paralyzed, plus many other sufferings of many kinds that I endured and even some as I said, caused by the devil, these were all nothing in comparison with the ones I experienced there...-St.Teresa of Avila's description of Hell.


These are the Tortures suffered by all the damned together, but that is not the end of the sufferings.
There are special Tortures destined for particular souls. These are the torments of the senses. Each soul undergoes terrible and indescribable sufferings related to the manner in which it has sinned.
I would have died
There are caverns and pits of torture where one form of agony differs from another. I would have died at the very sight of these tortures if the omnipotence of God had not supported me...-St.Faustina Kowalska's description of Hell.

"Then I was pushed into one of those fiery cavities and pressed, as it were, between burning planks, and sharp nails and red-hot irons seemed to be piercing my flesh."

Here Josefa repeated the multiple tortures from which no single member of the body is excluded:

"I felt as if they were endeavoring to pull out my tongue, but could not. This torture reduced me to such agony that my very eyes seemed to be starting out of their sockets. I think this was because of the fire which burns, burns... not a finger-nail escapes terrifying torments, and all the time one cannot move even a finger to gain some relief, nor change posture, for the body seems flattened out and yet doubled in two.-Sr.Joseph Menendez's description of Hell.
There was a certain rich man, who was clothed in purple and fine linen; and feasted sumptuously every day. And there was a certain beggar, named Lazarus, who lay at his gate, full of sores,
Desiring to be filled with the crumbs that fell from the rich man' s table, and no one did give him; moreover the dogs came, and licked his sores. And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham' s bosom. And the rich man also died: and he was buried in hell. And lifting up his eyes when he was in torments, he saw Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom: And he cried, and said: Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, to cool my tongue: for I am tormented in this flame. And Abraham said to him: Son, remember that thou didst receive good things in thy lifetime, and likewise Lazareth evil things, but now he is comforted; and thou art tormented.
And besides all this, between us and you, there is fixed a great chaos: so that they who would pass from hence to you, cannot, nor from thence come hither. And he said: Then, father, I beseech thee, that thou wouldst send him to my father' s house, for I have five brethren, That he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of torments. And Abraham said to him: They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them. But he said: No, father Abraham: but if one went to them from the dead, they will do penance.
And he said to him: If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they believe, if one rise again from the dead. -Luke :19-31, The Rich Man (Dives) and Lazarus.
Second Circle (Lust)

Gianciotto Discovers Paolo and Francesca
In the second circle of Hell are those overcome by lust. Dante condemns these "carnal malefactors"[ for letting their appetites sway their reason. They are the first ones to be truly punished in Hell. These souls are blown back and forth by the terrible winds of a violent storm, without rest. This symbolizes the power of lust to blow one about needlessly and aimlessly.
In this circle, Dante sees 
SemiramisDidoCleopatraHelen of TroyAchillesParisTristan, and many others who were overcome by sexual love during their life. Dante is told byFrancesca da Rimini how she and her husband's brother Paolo Malatesta committed adultery, but then died a violent death, in the name of Love, at the hands of her husband, Giovanni (Gianciotto). Francesca reports that their act of adultery was triggered by reading the adulterous story of Lancelot and Guinevere (an episode sculpted by Auguste Rodin in The Kiss). Nevertheless, she predicts that her husband will be punished for his fratricidein Caïna, within the ninth circle (Canto V).
Alse see Dante's experience in Hell in The Divine Comedy( Inferno)._______



It contains in it, after the Preparatory Prayer and two Preludes, five Points and one Colloquy:
Prayer. Let the Preparatory Prayer be the usual one.
First Prelude. The first Prelude is the composition, which is here to see with the sight of the imagination the length, breadth and depth of Hell.
Second Prelude. The second, to ask for what I want: it will be here to ask for interior sense of the pain which the damned suffer, in order that, if, through my faults, I should forget the love of the Eternal Lord, at least the fear of the pains may help me not to come into sin.
First Point. The first Point will be to see with the sight of the imagination the great fires, and the souls as in bodies of fire.
Second Point. The second, to hear with the ears wailings, howlings, cries, blasphemies against Christ our Lord and against all His Saints.
Third Point. The third, to smell with the smell smoke, sulphur, dregs and putrid things.
Fourth Point. The fourth, to taste with the taste bitter things, like tears, sadness and the worm of conscience.
Fifth Point. The fifth, to touch with the touch; that is to say, how the fires touch and burn the souls.
Colloquy. Making a Colloquy to Christ our Lord, I will bring to memory the souls that are in Hell, some because they did not believe the Coming, others because, believing, they did not act according to His Commandments; making three divisions...
- The Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius of Loyola, [1914]


Rome Vicariate, Ecclesia Dei, SSPX, FSSP, CMRI indicate Cardinal Ratzinger made an objective mistake in the Catechism

Cardinal Agostino Vallini and Rome's Auxiliary bishops,along with Ecclesia Dei, SSPX, FSSP all  agree with me : 1
1.The Catholic Church affirms the traditional rigorist interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS)  since they do not know of any exceptions.
2.So for Rome in 2015 , there are no exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II to the strict, Feeneyite version of the dogma.
3.Those who are saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire are not personally known to them.They are not exceptions.
They,  Rome Vicariate, Ecclesia Dei, SSPX, FSSP,CMRI ( I refer to them as the A+ group)  indicate that the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1257) is in error when it states ' God is not limited to the Sacraments'.
Since Cardinal Ratzinger's source for this statement  was only Cardinal Marchetti's theory which was incorporated in Vatican Council II (LG 14,AG 7 etc):-
1.Cardinal  Marchetti did not know any one  saved outside the Church i.e without faith and baptism.
2.There was no magisterial document before 1949 which made this claim.There was no precedent. Not a single Church document claimed  being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) and the baptism of desire(BOD) were known to us in personal cases to be exceptions.Neither did any magisterial document before 1949 directly state that these cases were exceptions to the dogma on salvation.There is no such reference in Quanto Conficiamur Moerore, Mystici Corporis or the Council of Trent.Not a single reference.
So except for Marchetti's personal theory Cardinal Ratzinger had no source, no reference,for this new doctrine, 'God is not limited to the Sacramemts', which is heresy.
The A+ group is now contradicting  Cardinal Ratzinger with common sense.They are saying that they physically, with the naked eye, cannot see any one saved in I.I or BOD and without the baptism of water in April 2015.
They all agree with me on this point.There are no denials.The deceased who are now in Heaven are not visible on earth today.Those who allegedly died without the  baptism of water centuries back ( if there was such a case) are not visible and known today. So they do not contradict Ad Gentes 7 when it says  'all' need 'faith and baptism' for salvation. They do not  contradict the dogma. We do not know any one alive today who will be saved without formal entry into the Church. If 'the man in the forest' is saved in I.I and without the baptism of water, as is often said, he would not be known to us personally. 
The issue here is not some concept of Feeneyism but if we can personally meet someone in April 2015 who is saved without 'faith and baptism'.Can we see him with the physical eye, do we know his name? No.So for us humans there cannot be exceptions to the dogma.The A+ group has no denial to issue here.
God has chosen to limit salvation to the Sacraments , according to the dogma EENS, and cardinals Ratzinger and Marchetti did not know of any exceptions.No one knew of any exceptions even during Vatican Council II (1960-65).
So it was Fr.Leonard Feeney who was magisterial ( and still is) while Cardinal Richard Cushing was in heresy.Cardinals Marchetti and Ratzinger were Cushingites.
I refer to the Marchetti Letter since it carries his name.The Letter however was made public after he died it is reported.It did not also carry the seal and signature of the responsible officials of the Holy Office.It is believed that the Letter was tampered with in the second half and Fr.Karl Rahner S.J hurriedly placed it in the Denzinger.
The first half of the Letter affirmed the traditional dogma and supported Fr.Leonard Feeney on doctrine. The second part, contradicted the first half of the Letter.This same pattern Cardinal Ratzinger has repeated in Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus etc.There are passages that vaguely affirm the traditional dogma while other passages contradict them, assuming being saved in I.I and BOD are known exceptions.So these documents during the pontificate of Pope John Paul II,  do not clearly affirm the rigorist interpretation of the dogma but a new version of it.
The A+ group now agrees that Vatican Council II can only be Feeneyite and not Cushingite.Since this is the only rational, common sense option.Cushingism implies that we can see the dead-saved on earth, who are visible exceptions to the dogma in the present times. The A+ group does not agree with this.
Vatican Council II is no more an ideological whip to be used against the Franciscans of the Immaculate, SSPX and traditionalists.They can affirm Vatican Council II and also the rigorist interpretation of EENS.This means an ecumenism of return  and non Catholics needing to formally convert into the Catholic Church for salvation.The dogma EENS is the moral basis for proclaiming the traditional teachings on Religious Liberty and the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political laws.
The A+ group affirms the 'crypto Lefebvre' position on Church ecclesiology.It still is exclusivist after Vatican Council II.
-Lionel Andrades


APRIL 3, 2015