Friday, January 30, 2015

I laici cattolici dovrebbero contattare i vescovi ausiliari di Roma: Vicariato insegna una falsità

Monsignor Lorenzo Leuzzi, vescovo ausiliare di Roma e cappellano del Parlamento italiano sul ottobre 29,2014 avuto un incontro con Stefano Bisi il Gran Maestro della Massoneria in Italia, 1 anche se la Chiesa insegna che non ci deve essere collaborazione con la massoni.

Il massoni e il resto della sinistra ebraica vuole la Chiesa cattolica rinnegare il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Coloro che sostengono il dogma ricevere una minaccia con diritti di sinistra.Cioe il Vicariato di Roma informato sacerdoti che non fanno 'questo errore'. Non e permissione per affermare in pubblica il dogma sul salvezza esclusivo nella Chiesa cattolica.Questa è stata seguita anche da Papa Benedetto XVI.

 Cardinale Agostono Vaillani, il Vicario Generale al Vicariato di Roma deve accogliere i massoni e gli altri che si oppongono alla Chiesa, e sostenere i pro- Satana valori.Allora il Vicariato accetta la lettera di Cardinale Marchetti (1949). Si dice coloro che sono salvati con il battesimo di desiderio, per esempio, sono eccezioni esplicite per la necessita di battesimo dell'acqua per tutti.Così si concludo che c'e una contraddizione con la tradizionale insegnamento  sul salvezza.Questo è irrazionale.Ma con questo irrazionalita loro rinnegare il dogma fuori della chiesa cattolica non c'e salvezza. Questo sarebbe stata approvata dal rabbino Riccardo Di Segni e Stefano Bisi presente alla riunione con il vescovo Lorenzo Leuzzi.
  
Il Vicariato interpreta il Concilio Vaticano II, con la premessa irrazionale. E politico. Da 2010 li stato informare, tramite questo blog e non faremo niente. Per il cardinale ei suoi vescovi presso la sede dal Universitaria San Giovanni in Laterano , i morti sono fisicamente visibili sulla terra.Per Cardinale Vaillani, Lumen Gentium 16 (essere salvato nell'ignoranza invincibile) diventa un'eccezione obiettivo per il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
 
Il Vicariato conosce  il ragiomento falso e usato per sbarazzarsi del dogma, che sarebbe un ostacolo alla cooperazione tra le religioni, in un futuro uno  religione mondiale, con una nuova immagine di Gesù e della Chiesa cattolica. 
 
Preti cattolici in Italia hanno detto che non ci sono noti eccezioni alla
dogma.2 Eppure per soddisfare la sinistra politica, compreso il Partito Democratico, il cui membro  era presente a tale riunione nel mese di ottobre, il Vicariato sta promuovendo una bugia obiettivo di farla finita il dogma tradizionale.

Così ora i sacerdoti sono autorizzati a proclamare Gesù, come il Salvatore, ma senza la necessità della chiesa cattolica.Senza la necessita per entarre con 'fede e battesimo'(AG 7, Concilio Vatican II).

La communita Francescani dell'Immacolata, per esempio, aveva affermato il dogma.Loro hanno ora di interpretare il Concilio Vaticano II, con la premessa irrazionale.Ora loro seminaria è ancora chiuso e seminaristi devono studiare in università pontificie di Roma, dove interpretano il Concilio Vaticano II, con la approvato fantasia  premise.3
 
Il Vicariato offrono laici cattolici una strana proposta.La proposta dice che loro e in grado di vedere i morti sulla terra.(LG 16,LG 8,NA 2 ecc) Questi morti diventa una rottura con il passato perche loro sono visibile sulla terra.
Concilio Vaticano II, senza questa falsa premessa, è veramente in accordo con il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, il Sillabo di Errore  e il Catechismo di Papa Pio X.
 
 I laici cattolici dovrebbero contattare i vescovi ausiliari di Rome.Noi cattolici non devono essere costretti a cambiare le nostre convinzioni religiose a causa della pressione dei nemici della Chiesa, ora al potere.
I vescovi di Vicariato e il cardinale Agostino Vaillani hanno l'obbligo di non insegnare una menzogna.Non e visibile eccezioni per il dogma in 2001 .Non dovrebbe far finta una insegnamente tradizionale.Questo e  la menzogna approvano per gli studenti delle università pontificie di Roma e centri di teologia per i laici.4
-Lionel Andrades
 
1.
2.
Fr.Marco Hausmann FSSP, Fr.P. Stefano Visintin OSB say there are no exceptions to the dogma, Cardinal Valliani's Vicariate says there are

3.
MANELLI FAMILIES STOP THE COERCION : ITS ILLEGAL

If you consider the Holy Office or Fr.Leonard Feeney in heresy determines how you interpret Vatican Council II http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/01/if-you-consider-holy-office-or.html

Fr.Frederico Lombardi does not address doctrinal questions on Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/frfrederico-lombardi-does-not-address.html#links
Understanding of Vatican Council II which is being forced upon the Fransciscans of the Immaculate is irrational http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/01/understanding-of-vatican-council-ii.html

Franciscans of the Immaculate officially being forced to accept heresy
4.
GREGORIAN UNIVERSITY MEETING JEWISH LEFT STANDARDS
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/01/gregorian-university-meeting-jewish.html
Fr.Marco Hausmann FSSP in Rome says there are no exceptions while the Vicariate is teaching young lay Catholics that there are exceptions
_____________________________________
 
January 29, 2015

Lay Catholics should contact the Auxiliary bishops of Rome : Vicariate teaches a falsehood http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/01/lay-catholics-should-contact-auxiliary.html

 
Attenzione famiglia Mannelli
 
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/01/attenzione-famiglia-mannelli.html



Fr.Volpi's interpretation of the Nicene Creed is different from mine


In the Nicene Creed we pray 'I believe  in one baptism for the forgiveness of sin' and this refers to the baptism of water, the ordinary means of salvation.
The baptism of desire and blood are not known baptisms. They are not defacto, objectively seen. They cannot be administered . The baptism of water instead is visible and repeatable.
So there are not three known baptisms but only one.If the person is saved with the baptism of desire and blood it would include the baptism of water. If a person is saved without the baptism of water, as many allege because of the confusion in the letter of Cardinal Marchetti Selvaggiani (1949), it would not be known to us. There are no objective cases.There is no known case  of someone saved without the baptism of water in 2015.
When Fr.Fidenzio Volpi OFM Cap., Commissioner of the Franciscans of the Immaculate offers Mass in Italian for him there is not one known baptism but three known baptisms. For him the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance ( without the baptism of water) are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. They would have to be known, to be exceptions.
It is because there are exceptions to the dogma for him I say that there is not one known baptism but three known baptisms for him.
 
For the Commissioner of the Franciscans of the Immaculate  Vatican Council II contradicts extra ecclesiam nulla salus. He does not mean all need the baptism of water in the Catholic Church for salvation.Far from it! There are exceptions! There  are visible exceptions to the Nicene Creed.The credal teaching is contradicted. There are visible exceptions to Jesus saying in the Bible (John 3:5) that all need the baptism of water for salvation.Not all!?

There are exceptions to the dogma for him? Then it means there are explict exceptions.If it was not explicit it would not be an exception.

This of course is not how the Nicene Creed was understood by St.Maximillian Kolbe.This is not  the Atranasius Creed of earlier times, which said  outside the Church there is no salvation.There are no exceptions, visible or invisible mentioned in those Creeds. Now we have the theology of exceptions.
This is a new Nicene Creed.It is the one approved by the new Franciscans of the Immaculate and of course the Vatican Curia. It was also approved by Pope Benedict XVI.Offer the Traditional Latin Mass but hold on to the exceptions to the dogma.
It is obvious heresy from the magisteriuim . Fr.Volpi is not the only one repeating it.It is also the heresy of the  Marchetti letter.
Even the'Lefebvrists' unknowingly support it.
 
So we have the traditional understanding of the Nicene Creed.There is one known baptism for the forgiveness of sin.Then we have the new version of three or more known baptisms for the forgivenes of sin.
Fr.Volpi wants the Franciscans of the Immaculate to accept the new one, which is heretical and irrational. Probably they are already doing so.
Where are the visible exceptions in Rome or the Vatican, to I believe in one known baptism for the forgiveness of sin?
For me there are no known exceptions to the Nicene Creed or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Vatican Council II does not mention any.
-Lionel Andrades


Impediment in the Traditional Latin Mass for the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/01/impediment-in-traditional-latin-mass.html



 

Impediment in the Traditional Latin Mass for the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate

Fr.Fidenzio Volpi,Father Alfonso Bruno,Fr.Angelo Geiger F.I are not affirming the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, since for them all references to salvation in Vatican Council II (LG 16 etc) are objective cases on earth, who are saved without the baptism of water.This is how the Correira della Serra, La Repubblica and other political left newspapers in Italy interpret Vatican Council II. They criticize the Traditional Latin Mass since they associate it with extra ecclesiam nulla salus.They approve  the Traditional Latin Mass only when the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is not affirmed as it was over the centuries.
So for  Fr.Fidenzio Volpi Ofm.Cap, Commissioner for the Franciscans of the Immaculate, Fr. Alfonso Bruno, Secretary General of the F.I and Fr.Angelo Geiger F.I,a delegate to North America and others,   all salvation in Heaven, mentioned in Vatican Council II, refers to persons saved without the baptism of water and most important , who are alive and visible on earth  in 2015.They are alive to become exceptions to the Feeneyite version of the dogma. This was the original irrationality in  the Marchetti letter of 1949.
 
 
If you ask these priests directly if the dead for us,  who are saved in Heaven are visible to them on earth in 2015, they would deny it. It would irrational.Yet this is exactly what they infer when they say Vatican Council II contradicts extra ecclesiam nulla salus . For them there are exceptions, like Lumen Gentium 16. An exception here implies the existence of a known person. If there was no known case there would not be a defacto exception to the dogma as it was known to St.Maximillian Kolbe, St.Francis of Assisi, St.Bonaventure and the the popes and Church Councils.
If Lumen Gentium  16 refers to an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus then it is implied that this exception: this person, is alive in the present times. He has been saved or is going to be saved without the baptism of water.This makes him an exception.
So this is  the 'new' Franciscans of the Immaculate approved by Poep Francis.This is their  new ideology in the Church; the visible -dead theory, the dead man walking and visible theology.
With this fantasy theology Fr.Alfonso Bruno rejects a defined dogma, changes the Nicene Creed, interprets  Vatican Council II with an irrationality and reportedly  offers the TLM for the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate.
According to St.Alphonsus Ligouri ,it is a grave sin to receive the Eucharist from a priest in manifest mortal sin ( Teologia Moralis 3). St.Alphonsus  says it is a sin against charity and religion.
The Franciscans Sisters of the Immaculate must tell Fr.Alfonso Bruno that they do not know any one in 2015 saved in 'invincible ignorance'(LG 16), a good conscience (LG 16), with ' a ray of the Truth' (NA 2), imperfect communion with  the Church (UR 3), or subsistit it (LG 8) etc . So there are no known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Vatican Council II does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Vatican Council II  without the irrational premise, does not contradict the traditional doctrines and theology on other religious and Christian communities.With the irrationality Vatican Council II  is pro-Left.
Then they should ask Fr.Fidenzio Volpi,Father Alfonso Bruno and Fr.Angelo Geiger F.I  to accept this interpretation of Vatican Council II, since their present one is irrational and heretical. 
But politically these priests will not be allowed to say that all non Catholics need to convert into the Church with no known exceptions in 2015.
They politically have to interpret Vatican Council with the irrational proposition( the dead now saved in invincible ignorance are exceptions to the dogma) and the irrational conclusion( so all non Catholics in the present times do not need to convert).This is acceptable for  the Masons and Jewish Left who are overseeing the community.
The Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate could announce that they accept Vatican Council II in agreement with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors and the Catechism of Pope Pius X and ask the priests to do the same before they offer Holy Mass.Otherwise it is an impediment to offering Holy Mass. To change the defined dogma and the Nicene Creed is a mortal sin.The sin is public  here.They are not afirming  doctrines which are obligatory for all Catholics. With this grave sin they offer Holy Mass.
-Lionel Andrades
 
Franciscans of the Immaculate