Saturday, October 31, 2015

Pope does not tell non Catholics they are going to Hell instead talks about fighting poverty together

Pope Francis does not tell non Catholics that they are going to Hell instead he talks about fighting poverty together ( see CNS video).
Our pope who does not tell non Catholics that they are on the way to Hell unless they convert into the Catholic Church, does not do justice to Vatican Council II.
Since Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) says all need 'faith and baptism' for salvation and non Christians whom he mentions in the CNS video do not have either.

Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. -Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II.

 Neither does the pope say that Catholics are the Chosen People, the new people of God. In Heaven there are only Catholics, who there with faith and baptism and without mortal sin on their soul.

 the Church is the new people of God- Nostra Aetate 4, Vatican Council II.

According to Vatican Council II Jews, Muslims and other non Catholics, are on the way to Hell unless they become 'card carrying members of the Church', unless they ' have their names on the parish baptism register'. This has also been the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church.
There is no change in the ecclesiology of the Church since being saved in invincible ignorance refer to invisible and not visible cases. So Lumen Gentium 16  is not an exception to Ad Gentes 7 or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
 
Those also can attain to salvation who through no fault of their own do not know the Gospel of Christ or His Church, yet sincerely seek God and moved by grace strive by their deeds to do His will as it is known to them through the dictates of conscience. -Lumen Gentium 16, Vatican Council II

The present Magisterium assumes LG 16 refers to visible cases and so Vatican Council II is interpreted as being a break with the old traditional ecclesiology.
Related image
This irrationality was used in the excommunication of Fr. Leonard Feeney.There are no known cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood or being saved in invincible ignorance, without the baptism of water. We humans cannot see or know these cases.

 Yet the Holy Office assumed they were exceptions to the Feeneyite version of the dogma and excommunicated the priest from Boston.

The Jesuits until today have not apologised for this irrationality. Neither does our Jesuit pope make any reference to this error by the Magisterium.
Related image
Similarly Archbishop Marcel  Lefebvre was excommunicated for not accepting Vatican Council II in which LG 16 is explicit and and so an exception to the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
 
There is no clarification from the Vatican. There should be an apology made to the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, the community of Fr. Leonard Feeney in the USA.

-Lionel Andrades

50th anniversary of “Nostra Aetate”

https://youtu.be/o4xmiMKgTBk

 
In a historic interreligious meeting, Pope Francis is embraced by Argentine Rabbi Abraham Skorka as he leaves after praying at the Western Wall in Jerusalem last year. On the right is Omar Abboud, Muslim leader from Argentina. (CNS/Paul Haring)
Nostra Aetate meeting does not say Vatican Council II really calls on Jews to convert

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/10/nostra-aetate-meeting-does-not-say.html




Jewish Left rabbis interpret Vatican Council II with the Baltimore Catechism error : factually wrong




Cardinal Muller has changed doctrine, supports the development of heresy

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/10/cardinal-muller-has-changed-doctrine.html
 

 
 

The Vatican has made a mistake and there is a cover up by liberal journalists


No comments: