Louie Verrecchio is living in adultery according to the old ecclesiology of the Traditional Latin Mass

A speaker on the SSPX circuit is living in adultery but  for the Novus Ordo Mass, the new ecclesiology and the accompanying liberal dispensations, which he has received.

According to the traditional ecclesiology of the Latin Mass, Louie Verrecchio would be in mortal sin for living with a Jew, since outside the Church there is no salvation.For the old Mass with the old ecclesiology there are no explicit exceptions to all having to formally enter the Church and avoid Hell.

In the old ecclesiology there is no baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOD), baptism of invincible ignorance(I.I) or other baptisms,without the baptism of water.

The Americans at Baltimore(1808), Boston(1949) and Vatican Council II ( 1965) made it easy for Louie Verrecchio to marry someone outside the Church and to go for Mass, as if it is not a mortal sin.

Verrecchio, like Bishop Bernard Fellay, uses a term(!°!!")  to describe the Novus Ordo Mass yet- but for the new ecclesiology, that term could be applied to his children according to the Catholic Church.This was the ecclesiology of the Old Mass, which he advocates today, without the old ecclesiology; without extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

Louie got a dispensation to marry a non Catholic, at a Novus Ordo church, where they reject the dogma EENS.For them BOD, BOB, I.I etc refer to salvation outside the Church, without the baptism of water.So his wife could be saved, it was probably assumed, without her having to be a formal member of the Church.

This is the new and irrational ecclesiology. It is a new way of thinking.It is a (!++/") innovation. ? I could use the word Louie used for the Mass to describe this innovation but I will not. The origina of the new ecclesiology was an innocent mistake. Something overlooked.It contradicted the magisterium of the past.Yet this is the irrational reasoning, with which, he and many others link to the Novus Ordo Mass. It is with this doctrinal innovation in the Catholic Church, Louie can live with his wife, go to Church and attend Mass as a Catholic.

The Baltimore Catechism cleared the way for him when it said being saved with implicit desire and martyrdom were baptisms. It was implying that BOD and BOB were baptisms like the baptism of water.This was a false inference. Since implicit desire for the baptism of water and martyrdom are known only to God.They are not seen or known to us.These cases are not visible and repeatable like the baptism of water.This innovation would years later help change the ecclesiology of the Mass and Louie would not be considered living in adultery.

In 1949, Pope Pius XII and the Archdiocese of Boston did not defend Fr.Leonard Feeney.So it was confirmed magisterially that there was known salvation outside the church.The error was official. The exclusivist ecclesiology, associated with worship and salvation, had been discarded.A dogma is thrown out.Louie would no more be in mortal sin and he could receive the Eucharist at Mass.

So today Louie will write often on non Catholics needing to convert for salvation, and he will say it in charity and meaningfully, but he will not affirm the rigorist interpretation of the dogma EENS.If he did, he would be saying that his wife is outside the Church.

He now has even announced that his wife is a Jew implying she is going to Heaven and he is living with her.

All this was possible not because of any fault in the Novus Ordo Mass, but because of the Baltimore-Boston-Vatican Council II ecclesiology, attached to the Novus Ordo Mass. FSSP priests in Rome use this new ecclesiology also when they offer the Traditional Latin Mass.

When Louie and Bishop Fellay refer to innovation they are really referring to the LG 16-is-explicit-for-us ecclesiology, which they accept unknowingly.This is the innovation.The liturgy of the Novus Ordo Mass is not at fault.Since this Mass can be offered without this innovation.

When the Greek Mass was replaced with Latin, the Traditional Latin Mass was the new Mass but the ecclesiology was still traditional.When the Novus Ordo Mass replaced the Latin Mass, the ecclesiology was new and not traditional.
When will Louie discuss this point in relation to the Mass?

-Lionel Andrades