Franciscans of the Immaculate Superiors expected to meet next month in Rome : ecclesiology

When the Superiors of the Franciscans of the Immaculate (F.I) meet next month in Rome they must be asked to recognise that the hermeneutic of continuity or rupture in Vatican Council II depends on the interpretation of LG 16, LG 8, NA 2, UR 3 etc.Will they be interpreted  to be explicit or implicit  for us? Are they visible or invisible for the Commissioner of the F.I.? Does LG 16 etc refer to personally known  or hypothetical cases in 2015 for the three canonist priests overseeing the  fractured community.This decides the ecclesiology of the Mass in all Rites-is LG explicit like the blood you see on your finger when you cut it or is it implicit like the thoughts which race through the mind of people I watch walking on the street pavements.

Once this is decided and announced( that LG 16 is not explicit but implicit, not visible but invisible for us) then the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate priests , whether they offer the Novus Ordo or Traditional Latin Mass,  will affirm an exclusivist ecclesiology, when interpreting Vatican Council II and other Church documents.

Yes the Catechisms since 1808 mention being saved with the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood (BOD),and in invincible ignorance(I.I) but the F.I do not need to infer that these are known cases in 2015. They have an option.Explicit or implict.

These cases are always invisible for us.They cannot be anything else for the F.I. So the community does not have  to infer that invisible cases are exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) or Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 which say all need faith and baptism for salvation.

All need faith and baptism ( AG , LG 14) in 2015 and there are no known exceptions.There cannot be any known exception.This is sufficient to  go back to the old ecclesiology when offering Holy Mass.

So when the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1995), which all the F.I follow, refer to these invisible for us cases, they are obviously not an exception to the Feeneyite version of EENS, the rigorist interpretation of the dogma on salvation.
 Fr.Sabibo Ardito SDB and and Pope Francis cannot say Vatican Council II has changed ecclesiology and according to the new ecclesiology there is salvation outside the Church. There is no known salvation outside the Church. This is a fact of life. No one can name any person who has been saved outside the Church in 2015. We do not know the name and surname of any one saved over the last 70 plus years, or more, without 'faith and baptism'.

So there is no practical evidence for the new ecclesiology or the rejection of the ecclesiology of the Traditional Latin Mass.

When the Holy Office(CDF) in 1949 believed Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center were wrong , it was an objective mistake.Objectively no one in 1949 knew of someone saved outside the Church without 'faith and baptism'.Personally no one knew of someone being saved with implicit desire or martyrdom and without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.

So these non existent cases should not be the basis of a new ecclesiology which the Franciscans of the Immaculate must accept per force.

The Holy Office 1949 in the Boston Case made a factual error and used this error to create a theology/ecclesiology which was a break with the Nicene Creed ( I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sin) and  the Athanasius Creed(whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the catholic faith.) It is also a  break with the Syllabus of Errors and the dogma EENs.This is magisterial heresy.

We have found the missing link as to what creates a hermeneutic of rupture in the interpretation of Vatican Council II. We do not need a new Syllabus of Errors on Vatican Council II as Bishop Athansius Schneider once suggested.

We do not need a Syllabus of Errors on Vatican Council II since we  have found the missing link which decides the hermeneutic of continuity and it is the same missing link needed to have a rational theology once again; the old ecclesiology with  the Novus Ordo and the Traditional Latin Mass.

-Lionel Andrades

Canon Law violated by the Father Sabino Ardito SDB, Commissar for the Franciscans of the Immaculate
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/08/canon-law-violated-by-commissioner-of.html