The SSPX is already using the 1949 Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani error as does Pope Francis and Cardinal Muller, to interpret Vatican Council II.The difference is that the SSPX rejects Vatican Council II ( with the Marchetti error) while Pope Francis accepts Vatican Council II (with the Marchetti error used in the interpretation)
The SSPX should go ahead and accept Vatican Council II and clarify that it is without the irrational premise and inference.
They should also clarify that the Holy Office 1949 was wrong since in 2015 they do not know of any exceptions i.e non Catholics who have been saved or will be saved, without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.They cannot name any one who will go to Heaven this year without 'faith and baptism'.
Once they make this clarification then it is to be seen if Pope Francis and the Vatican Curia will accept Vatican Council II without the irrational interpretation.
The SSPX has simply to announce that they accept Vatican Council II ( without the irrational premise and inference) and they also accept the rigorist interpretation of EENS(according to the SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012). Then watch the world wide reaction.
Though, the SSPX would also be saying that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre made the same doctrinal error as Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani.
I don't see the SSPX and sedevacantists saying their teacher made a mistake.
Archbishop Lefebvre was responsible for the religious formation of Bishop Bernard Fellay the Superior General of the SSPX and also of the now sedevacantists Bishop Donald Sanborn and Fr.Anthony Cekada.
They in turn have passed on Marchetti's reasoning to numerous other Catholic traditionalists and sedevacantists.This was modernism and liberalism among the traditionalists.The heretical trads were accusing the liberals of heresy unaware that they were using the same basic reasoning to interpret Church documents after 1949.
WAITING AND WATCHING
WAITING AND WATCHING
The enemies of the Church are now waiting and watching.They want the SSPX to sign the doctrinal preamble and maintain their present silence.
They are also happy with the sedevacantists since they are intepreting Vatican Council II with Marchetti's irrationality. The sedes are not aware that Vatican Council II affirms the rigorist interpretation of EENS.
They are happy with Catholics in general who reject Feeneyism, thinking it is heresy. Catholics do not know that Feeneyism was the official teaching of the Catholic Church for centuries before the Boston Case in the 1940's.The magisterium is not going to tell them this. For political reasons the magisterium will let the error continue.
MEDIA SPARES SSPX
MEDIA SPARES SSPX
Have you noticed that over the last few months the Jewish Left media, as if on cue, have not been critcizing the SSPX? The spider is watching as the insect flies closer to its web.
The spiritual heirs of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre can still turn things around.They must identify Marchettis's error which is a factual one. It is not a theological error. The factual error became the basis for a new theology.
They could simply announce that there are no known cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance in 2015.There are no known and living cases of non Catholics referred to in LG 16, UR 3, NA 2 etc.
So Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake, the common mistake.He was wrong.Vatican Council II does not contradict the rigorist interpretation of the dogma EENS.
Feeneyism is the official teaching of the Catholic Church according to magisterial texts, before and after Vatican Council II ( Ad Gentes 7, Lumen Gentium 14, Catechism of the Catholic Church 1257,Dominus Iesus 20, Redemptoris Missio 55 etc).Yet Feeneyism is rejected by the contemporary magisterium and the traditionalists and sedevacantists.
An announcement is needed :-
1. There are no known exceptions to Feeneyism in 2015.
2. Before 1949 no magisterial document says the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are explicit and so are exceptions to EENS.
3. Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani made a factual error. He did not know of anyone saved outside the Church i.e without faith and baptism.So there was no salvation outside the Catholic Church.
4.Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre accepted the Cardinal Marchetti Selvaggiani factual error.It is a fact of life that the dead-saved are not visible and known on earth for them to be exceptions to EENS.
5.There is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict Feeneyism.
-Lionel Andrades
So Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake, the common mistake.He was wrong.Vatican Council II does not contradict the rigorist interpretation of the dogma EENS.
Feeneyism is the official teaching of the Catholic Church according to magisterial texts, before and after Vatican Council II ( Ad Gentes 7, Lumen Gentium 14, Catechism of the Catholic Church 1257,Dominus Iesus 20, Redemptoris Missio 55 etc).Yet Feeneyism is rejected by the contemporary magisterium and the traditionalists and sedevacantists.
An announcement is needed :-
1. There are no known exceptions to Feeneyism in 2015.
2. Before 1949 no magisterial document says the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are explicit and so are exceptions to EENS.
3. Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani made a factual error. He did not know of anyone saved outside the Church i.e without faith and baptism.So there was no salvation outside the Catholic Church.
4.Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre accepted the Cardinal Marchetti Selvaggiani factual error.It is a fact of life that the dead-saved are not visible and known on earth for them to be exceptions to EENS.
5.There is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict Feeneyism.
-Lionel Andrades
1
Sedevacantist seminary is not aware of superflous passages in Vatican Council II originating from the 1949 Marchetti error
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/08/sedevacantist-seminary-is-not-aware-of.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment