Friday, February 20, 2015

This is not Catholic doctrine.It is a false doctrine that the SSPX has to accept

However the SSPX priests do not even want to discuss this.They say that they reject Feeneyism and support Marchetti.

Pope Benedict XVI and the SSPX



 



TO THE BISHOPS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
CONCERNING THE REMISSION OF THE EXCOMMUNICATION
OF THE FOUR BISHOPS CONSECRATED BY ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE
 
 
This disciplinary level needs to be distinguished from the doctrinal level. The fact that the Society of Saint Pius X does not possess a canonical status in the Church is not, in the end, based on disciplinary but on doctrinal reasons. As long as the Society does not have a canonical status in the Church, its ministers do not exercise legitimate ministries in the Church. There needs to be a distinction, then, between the disciplinary level, which deals with individuals as such, and the doctrinal level, at which ministry and institution are involved. In order to make this clear once again: until the doctrinal questions are clarified, the Society has no canonical status in the Church, and its ministers – even though they have been freed of the ecclesiastical penalty – do not legitimately exercise any ministry in the Church.

 

Pope Benedict was interpreting Vatican Council II with the Marchetti Inference and this made the Council a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.

So this is not Catholic doctrine.This is a false doctrine that the SSPX has to accept.

The hermenutic of continuity and rupture depend on the use or omission of the irrational premise from Marchetti's Letter of the Holy Office 1949.

Vatican Council II can be interpreted by the SSPX without the Marchetti Inference. Then the Council would not contradict the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Church.

But how can the SSPX leaders do this?

They will have to change completely their way of looking at Vatican Council II.They would have to admit that they too were interpreting the Council with the Marchetti premise. So the Council was a break with traditional doctrine on salvation, ecclesiology etc.

How can the SSPX now say that Feeneyism was correct and that the Council is Feeneyite.? Vatican Council II  does not contradict the traditional teaching on other religions and ecumenism since it does not contradict the dogma.LG 16,LG 8,UR 3 etc refer to hypothetical cases. Theoretical cases cannot be defacto exceptions to the dogma and the Syllabus in 2015.

So doctrinally they could accept Vatican Council II as traditional when the premise is not used.However their priests do not even want to discuss this.They just say that they reject Feeneyism and support Marchetti.
They have a right to canonical status since without Marchetti's mistake Vatican Council II is pro-SSPX.This was not known or accepted by Pope Benedict XVI.
-Lionel Andrades

The two hermeneutics depend on the use or omission of the irrational premise from Marchetti's letter http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/the-two-hermenutics-depend-on-use-or.html
 

No comments: