Lionel:
Deacon Augustine:
Would you say that the baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are not exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the need for Christians to convert to avoid Hell ?
Did the Holy Office 1949 make an objective mistake?
February 18, 2015
Louie Verrecchio's wife is not Catholic, he interprets the dogma on exclusive salvation with an irrational premise and so it is not a sin for him
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/louie-verrecchios-wife-is-not-catholic.html
Would you say that the baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are not exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the need for Christians to convert to avoid Hell ?
Did the Holy Office 1949 make an objective mistake?
February 18, 2015
Louie Verrecchio's wife is not Catholic, he interprets the dogma on exclusive salvation with an irrational premise and so it is not a sin for him
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/louie-verrecchios-wife-is-not-catholic.html
-Lionel Andrades
http://thatthebonesyouhavecrushedmaythrill.blogspot.it/2015/02/they-didnt-die-for-ecumenism.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment