Archbishop Thomas Gullickson, John Martigioni and Fr.Rev. Fr.P. Stefano Visintin OSB, Dean of the Faculty of Theology at the Pontifical University St.Anselm agree with me : there are no visible exceptions.

Comments from "Extra ecclesiam nulla salus" - What does it mean? 

DECEMBER 19, 2014

But, You do have a history of making-up stuff and posting partial quotes to give the appearance of others agreeing with you - a practice all can see in here on this thread where you continue to claim that what MJ posted actually supports your argument.

Lionel:

I don't know who is MJ.

I have mentioned that Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson, Fr.Stepehn Visintin, Dean of Theology at the Pontifical University of St.Anslem, Rome and the American apologist John Martigioni agree with me. There are also many priests in Rome who agree with me . I have quoted them on my blog.Recently an FSSP priest in Rome Fr.Marco Hausmann agreed with me.

I am not saying anything extraordinary and neither are they.It is a fact of life that we cannot see or know exceptions to the dogma.

_______________________

Dear Lionel. It was M.Js intention to bury your support for Feeney's heresy under an avalanche of sources...

Lionel:

There is not a single quote from Tradition before 1949 which says that the baptism of desire is known and visible to us and so is an exception to the centuries old interpretation of the dogma.

Not a single quote! Not a single source.

The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 was a break with Tradition.

_____________________

But MJ doubts you will be able to convince others that Feeney was right and the Catholic church wrong.

Lionel:

I have quoted above an American Archbishop, a Benedictine Dean of Theology and an American apologist.They agree with me.

There are no known exceptions to the dogma. This is something fundamental. Even Catholics with no knowledge of theology agree. 

____________________

Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson says Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/archbishop-thomas-egullickson-says.html#links

____________________

Catholic Religious indicate the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made a factual mistake :implicit desire etc is not visible to us
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/catholic-religious-indicate-letter-of.html#links 
__________________________

Catholic religious contradict Bishop Fellay : Nostra Aetate is not an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/catholic-religious-contradict-bishop.html#links

_____________________________________


DEAN OF THEOLOGY AT ST. ANSELM SAYS THERE ARE NO KNOWN EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/10/dean-of-theology-at-st-anselm-says.html

______________________________

CATHOLIC PRIESTS IN ROME AGREE WITH FR.LEONARD FEENEY: THERE IS NO BAPTISM OF DESIRE THAT WE CAN KNOW OF
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2011/08/catholic-priests-in-rome-agree-with.html#links
____________________

How can zero cases of something be considered exceptions ?- John Martigioni

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/sspx-only-way-out-now.html#links
________________________

Implicit intention, invincible ignorance and a good conscience (LG 16) in Vatican Council II do not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus –John Martigioni

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/implicit-intention-invincible-ignorance.html#links
_____________________________________

-Lionel Andrades

http://pblosser.blogspot.it/2014/12/extra-ecclesiam-nulla-salus-what-does.html