The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary (Still River and Richmond N.H communities ) , traditionalists, like the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) and sedevacantists Congregatio Mariae Reginae Immaculatae( CMRI) have been interpreting Vatican Council II with the same irrational premise.So the Council comes across as a break with the past when it really is in line with Fr.Leonard Feeney and his traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This should be cause for joy in the traditional camp if they understand the mechanics of what is happening here!!
They have made an innocent oversight.Vatican Council II does not contradict Fr.Leonard Feeney at LG 16,LG 8,NA 2,UR 3.
There cannot be a theology which says LG 16,LG 8 etc are exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus since there are no concrete cases in our reality for them to be an exception.This is a breakthrough!!! On the premise of being able to see the dead now in Heaven this year we cannot create a theology.
The baptism of desire or Vatican Council II (LG 16,LG 8 ,UR 3 etc) cannot be an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Practically it is not possible.
The whole Vatican Council II scenario has changed .There will be unbelievable ramifications.For one, the traditionalists are no longer on the defensive.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/11/how-does-council-contradict-frleonard.html#links,UR 3 etc?
Bad theology among traditionalists http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/
Even the St.Benedict Centers whom Fr.Kramer criticizes interprets Vatican Council II with the same irrational reasoning. http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/11/slaves-of-immaculate-heart-of-mary-are.html