These links are an application of what I have been saying in the comments section of the Catholicism.org article Revolutionary Doctrines on the Family October 22, 2014 http://catholicism.org/ad-rem-no-237.html
October 30, 2014
SSPX APPEAL TO BISHOP MARCELLO SEMERARO TO ENDORSE VATICAN COUNCIL II WITHOUT THE FALSE PREMISE FOR AN AGREEMENT
But why do the traditionalists condone a modernist teaching?
The SSPX and the St.Benedict Centers do not realize still that the baptism of desire etc are not exceptions to the dogma.They are irrelevant.
The Eucharist is real, so we can see the host with the naked eye.So we can have a theology and an understanding of the Eucharist.
The baptism of desire is not real or tangible like the Eucharist.You can have an intellectual explanation of it but you cannot have a theology which makes it an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Similarly there cannot be a theology which says LG 16,LG 8 etc are exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.There are no concrete cases in our reality for it to be an exception.On the premise of being able to see the dead now in Heaven this year we cannot create a theology.
So how can the baptism of desire or Vatican Council II (LG 16,LG 8 ,UR 3 etc) be an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus?
Kasper the Friendly Liar