Wednesday, September 17, 2014

Did the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate appeal to Cardinal Burke ?

Friday, September 5, 2014

Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate appeal to the Signatura with the following facts

Blackfen unity

Fr.Steven Fischer is the new parish priest apointed by Archbishop Peter Smith of Southwark,England to replace Fr Tim Finigan, at the parish of Our Lady of the Rosary at Blackfen, where Fr.Finigan offered the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM). Fr.Fischer has called for unity.
Fr.Fischer has also announced that there there will be no TLM at Blackfen from next month according to reports on line.

The understanding of Church ( ecclesiology) of the TLM is extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is in agreement with Vatcan Council II , intepreted without the false premise.So those who attend the TLM, whether they know it or not, are in unity with the ecclesiology of Vatican Council II ( without the premise). They are in unity with Scrripture, Tradition and  Magisterium of the Church before and after Vatican Council II (upto Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI). Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II supports the TLM ecclesiology when it states all need faith and baptism for salvation.1
So according to Vatican Council II (AG 7) all Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, Mulsims and other non Christians, for example in London, need Catholic Faith and the baptism of water for salvation.Jews,Mulsims and other non Christians do not have 'faith and baptism' and so they are oriented to Hell at the time of death according to Vatican Council II (AG 7).
For Fr.Steven Fischer and those who attend Holy Mass in the vernacular, however, there is a new understanding of Church. They interpret Vatican Council II with an irrational premise.There ecclesiology is based on an irrationality.With this irrational ( visible dead exceptions) they interpret many magisterial documents including the Catechism of the Catholic Church.Fr.Fischer will now want those who attended the TLM to change their concept of Church based on the false premise.For him this would be 'unity'.
For him and the Catholic Bishops Conference of England and Wales unity would mean:
1.Inferring that  non Catholics saved in invincible ignorance(LG 16) etc, without the baptism of water ,are physically visible to us on earth even though they are in Heaven.
2.These deceased who are visible and known on earth, are living exceptions in 2014 to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors, the Catechism of Pope Pius X.They are examples of salvation outside the Church; all not needing to be formal members of the Church in the present times.
3. Conclusion: So since there is alleged salvation outside the Church, based on the irrational premise mentioned above (1&2) there is a new ecclesiology and a theology of religions.
 Without this false premise Vatican Council II (AG 7) would be in harmony with extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Tradition. While NA 2, UR 3, LG 8,LG 16 etc would not be exceptions, since they are not explicit.They are known only to God.
So  Fr.Steven Fischer,the English bishops and the Jewish Left, want those who attend the TLM to be in unity with this fantasy theology, which is a rejection of Vatican Council II.It is a rejection of  rationality and Catholic Tradition.
 Possibly those who attended the TLM at Blackfen will be silent over this issue. This would be similar to the professors at the Fischer More College, USA and the Franciscans Friars of the Immaculate who interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise and so rejected the Council not knowing that there was an alternative interpretation.
At Blackfen they will have to be in unity with Fr.Fischer and the English bishops who are asking them to accept this fantasy theology based on an irrationality.They are silent.
The Latin Mass Society Chairman in England, Joseph Shaw, does not want to support extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II without the premise.It could bring persecution for him.He is silent.
Rorate Caeili does not want to mention it since they have already been warned by the Left.
The cardinal-archbishop of Westminister  to please the political left is not going to accept Vatican Council II without the false premise. It  indicates all non Catholics and non Christians need to convert into the Catholic Church to avoid the fires of Hell.
Who at Blackfen is going to say Vatican Council II (without the premise) tells us that all Jews, Muslims and others need to convert for salavtion and all Protestants, Orthodox Christians,Evangelicals and others, need Catholic Faith  to go to Heaven (AG 7). This includes the Sacraments of the Catholic Church, and the faith and moral teachings.
This is the ecclesiology of the TLM and the Novus Ordo Mass , since Catholic doctrine has not changed, when the irrational premise is not used in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.Those who attend the TLM and Novus Ordo Mass are united in a common ecclesiology when the false premise is not used.
Presently at Blackfen Fr.Steven Fischer will promote this irrationality in the interpretation of  Redemptoris Missio(N.10 is contradicted by 28 etc.Issued in 1990), Balamand Declaration(N.30, June 1993), Catechism of the Catholic Church (1257.Issued in1994 ), Dominus Iesus(1 is contradicted by 2 etc. 2000), Christianity and the World Religions (N.10 and 67.(1997)International Theological Commission) and The Hope of Infants who die without being baptised (N.59 etc (April 20.2007) International Theological Commission ).
Unity with all this confusion! -Lionel Andrades
Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. -Ad Gentes 7


The Catechism and Vatican Council II are Feeneyite if you avoid the false premise
It is common knowledge that we cannot see the dead who are in Heaven. CCC 1257-1260 infers that we can!



Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate are misled by the line 'God is not limited to the Sacraments'

The old and new Mass in future will be based on the hermeneutic of continuity



Why did the Holy Office 1949 mention the baptism of desire as an exception to the dogma? This is a factual mistake




Fr.Fidenzio Volpi, Fr.Alfono Bruno given mandatum to teach FFI seminarians an irrationality

I do not use an irrational inference, a false premise, so there is no discontinuity between Vatican II and Tradition

There can be a Vatican Council II according to a leftist or 'right wing' ideology : it depends upon the premise

 There cannot be a continuity with the past in Vatican Council II if a false premise is used in the interpretation
Meeting needed between Ecclesia Dei/CDF, SSPX,CMRI and others: all agree that the baptism of desire is not an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus

Fischer More College and the Franciscans of the Immaculate have to accept these lies to be allowed the Traditional Latin Mass.

Michael King an American must claim he can see the dead on earth

 I affirm the traditional teaching on religious liberty,other religions and ecumenism, without rejecting Vatican Council II

The SSPX (SOS-Resistance) does not clarify if they are referring to Vatican Council II with or without the premise

Cantarella understands that the baptism of desire is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus: extend the reasoning to Vatican Council II

The SSPX uses the same irrational theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its interpretation of Vatican Council II

Balamand Declaration and the Factual Error in the Catechism of the Catholic Church

Vatican Council II itself supports the SSPX General Chapter Statement- no one is discussing this point

Letter of the Holy Office 1949 presents a theology of the baptism of desire when there is no known case in existence 

There are no exisiting cases and you are discussing principles and theology as if they existed in real life

The Call to Holiness and Catholic Identity Conference speakers will use a false premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, Redemptoris Missio, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Dominus Iesus...

SSPX get smart!
What a mess !

If the Letter of the Holy Office simply referred to implicit desire and being saved in invincible ignorance and left it at that it would be fine 

Muller-Fellay Meeting: Cardinal Muller will not accept Vatican Council II without the irrational premise and he wants the SSPX, FFI to use the false premise with the Council and Catechism ?