Fr.Paul Morgan, the District Superior of the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX,Great Britain) cannot criticize the Transformed in Christ Catechesis and Evangelisation 1since the same error has been made by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Bishop Bernard Fellay.
HannahVaughan-Spruce , in her Catechesis program, may mean well and she could also be a good catechist, but she is using the doctrinal error approved by the Catholic Bishop's Conference of England and Wales (CBCEW).
The same error is made at the instituions where she studied theology.
So at preparation for Confirmation or Evangelisation she cannot say that every one must be a Catholic to go to Heaven.
Fr.Paul Morgan cannot criticize Hannah Vaughan-Spruce or the CBCEW for assuming that there are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Since this was the error made by Bishop Bernard Fellay in his last Letter to Friends and Benefactors 82.2
Bishop Fellay, the SSPX Superior General, infers that all non Catholics who are saved with 'a ray of the Truth' (NA 2) etc are visible to us on earth. He infers that they are visible since he considers these cases as being exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus which he mentions in the Letter.If it is an exception then it is visible.This is a subtle inference. With this irrational inference he has denied the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.He does not realise that it is the inference which contradicts the dogma. Instead he blames Vatican Council II in a vague way.
Similarly the CBCEW has a video on its website which says not every one needs to enter the Catholic Church for salvation, according to Vatican Council II.This same error of mixing up what is implicit as being explicit, what is hypothetical as being known in reality, is made by the Catholic Prof. Gavin D'Costa on the CBEW video. The video can also be seen on the website of the University of Bristol and Fr.Morgan has nothing to say.
Fr.Paul Morgan cannot protest. Since he would be contradicting his Superiors . They could ask him to join the SSPX Resistance .There the same error is made by the SSPX priests and their English bishop, Williamson.
They are not aware of the irrational inference and then they say there is ambiguity in Vatican Council. They say there are exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus not aware of the false premise. With the false premise there is no Catholic mission with Catholic doctrine.The traditionalists and the liberals are using the same irrational inference to change Catholic dogma and doctrine.The result is that the liberal CBCEW accepts Vatican Council II with the irrationality and the SSPX rejects Vatican Council II with the same irrational reasoning.
They both are not aware that the Council can also be interpreted without the irrational inference. Then Hannah's catechesis and evangelisation would also change.
April 23-August 26,2014 - still no clarification from the SSPX
SSPX (GB) uses irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II so avoids saying Jews, Muslims, Protestants need to convert
Cardinal Nicols and FIUV are telling a falsehood. Why do rank and file Catholics have to accept it?