Saturday, August 2, 2014

Implementing a falsehood

I had mentined in an earlier post that Fr.Angelo Geiger and Fr.Alfonsos Bruno want the whole Church and the Franciscans of the Immaculate to accept Vatican Council II with an irrationality.This is the irrationality used by Enzo Bianchi in his ecumenism.
The majority of the members of the Franciscans of the Immaculate are refusing to accept Vatican Council II in which it is assumed that all salvation mentioned in the Council, refer to visible cases on earth who are explicit exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
This is the interpretation accepted by Fr.Fidenzio Volpi Ofm.Cap., the Apostolic Commissioner of the FFI,  Fr. Angelo Geiger and Fr.Alfonso Bruno.
This is the interpretation of Vatican Council II which is being criticized by traditionalists  since it is a break with Sacred Tradition.It has the hermeneutic of rupture due to the false premise.
Francesco Collafemmina and others must note that the Vatican Curia is imposing an irrational version of Vatican Council II on all Catholics. This is  Vatican Council II with the dead man visible theory. We can allegedly see dead men walking according to them.
Those who criticize the use of an irrational premise in the interpretaion of magisterial documents including Vatican Council II are promoting a falsehood. It is a lie.
Those of us who are faithful to the teachings of the Catholic Church must not be asked to interpret the Council and the Catechism of the Catholic Church with a lie, a known falsehood.
If the Franciscans of the Immaculate, main body, are allowed to accept Vatican Council II like me, they could still be faithful to Tradition and the Council.Fr.Fidenzio Volpi could allow them  to affirm Vatican Council II in agreement with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.He and Fr.Alfonso Bruno should set an example and be the first to do it. Fr.Angelo Geiger says that  Vatican Council II is not a break with Tradition.Fine, then can he affirm Vatican Council II in agreement with the defined dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ?.
The issue is that Fr.Alfonso Bruno represents the Vatican Curia whose members  are not being allowed by the Jewish Left to interpret Vatican Council II in agreement with extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Franciscans of the Immaculate novices are to be taught new doctrines approved by the Left. They will be taught wrongly that Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition especially the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was interpreted by the Church Councils, popes and saints.They will be asked to reject Vatican Council II ( Ad Gentes 7) which says all need faith and baptism for salvation.-Lionel Andrades

Fr.Angelo Geiger and Fr. Alfonso Bruno want the Franciscans of the Immaculate and the whole Church to accept Vatican Council II with an irrationality

No ecumenism with Paolo Detto : Enzo Bianchi threathens judicial action against Riscossa Cristiana

Enzo Bianchi the prior of the liberal Monastery of Bose,known for its heretical teachings, and  who has recently been appointed a member of the Pontifical Council for Christian Unity has threathened  legal action against Paolo Detto, the editor of the traditional Riscossa Cristiana,it has been reported by Correspondenza Romana.
According to Riscossa Cristiana, after the defamation suit by the Pontifical College Capranica against the Director of Correpondenza Romana and then the defamation charge against Francesco Colafemmina by Fr.Alfonso Bruno the secretary general of the Franciscans of the Immaculate, now it's the turn of Riscossa Cristiana.
Francesco Colafemmina's who has a blog Fides et Forma has been sued for defamation by Fr.Alfonso Bruno, the secretary general fo the 'new' Franciscans of the Immaculate, it has been reported.
According to Rorate Caeili, Colafemmina said '...the officer was kind enough to explain to me that Father Bruno had written some pages of the complaint, accusing me of having defamed him "as a man and as a religious" saying that he was a "traitor".
Enzo Bianchi has objected to the use of his picture in reports in Riscossa Cristiana critical of him.
-Lionel Andrades