Wednesday, July 30, 2014

Rector of Pontfical Capranica College,Rome sues director of traditional Correspondenza Romano

Last May the Rector of the Pontfical Capranica College, Rome sued for libel the director of the traditional news agency "Correspondenza Romana", the issue is still in court according to Correspondenza Romana.So now Fr. Alfonso Bruno's lawsuit against Francesco Colafemmina was predictable.
According to Roberto de Mattei writing in Correspondenza Romana, democracy is also this: the freedom to express opinions in a clear way, and sometimes unwelcome to those who do not like the discussion. Characteristic of totalitarian regimes is instead to plug the mouth of the dissenters and entrust them to the re-education of the State.

The Kingdom of God is a mystery for the Aquinas Institute of Theology :USCCB policy of dissent continues

The Kingdom of God and the Kingdom of Heaven is a mystery for the Aquinas Institute of Theology.The USCCB video Reflection for today does not associate it with Jesus and the Catholic Church.
Ann Garrido,DMin., goes off into an abstratc tangent but a politically safe one.
She is careful to contradict Dominus Iesus which says that the Kingdom of God must not be separated from Jesus and neither from the Catholic Church. She does just this.She separates the Kingdom from the Catholic Church. She is following the USCCB's public policy of dissent.
The USCCB does not affirm the Social Reign of Jesus over all political laws since this is part of a public agreement with Jewish Left rabbis. They also do not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as part of that same understanding. So they feel obliged to state that there is known salvation outside the Church i.e LG 16,NA 2 etc refer to the deceased saved, who are now visible exceptions on earth, to all needing saving-faith and baptism.Visible in the flesh deceased!
This expedience is manifested today in Ann Garrido 's spirited talk sans Catholic doctrine.
For months together no one has said in these reflections on the USCCB video that the Catholic Church is necessary for salvation.This is having good relations with the American rabbis and living comfortably.-Lionel Andrades

July 30, 2014

Wednesday of the Seventeenth Week in Ordinary Time
Lectionary: 403

Reading 1 jer 15:10, 16-21

Woe to me, mother, that you gave me birth!
a man of strife and contention to all the land!
I neither borrow nor lend,
yet all curse me.
When I found your words, I devoured them;
they became my joy and the happiness of my heart,
Because I bore your name,
O LORD, God of hosts.
I did not sit celebrating
in the circle of merrymakers;
Under the weight of your hand I sat alone
because you filled me with indignation.
Why is my pain continuous,
my wound incurable, refusing to be healed?
You have indeed become for me a treacherous brook,
whose waters do not abide!
Thus the LORD answered me:
If you repent, so that I restore you,
in my presence you shall stand;
If you bring forth the precious without the vile,
you shall be my mouthpiece.
Then it shall be they who turn to you,
and you shall not turn to them;
And I will make you toward this people
a solid wall of brass.
Though they fight against you,
they shall not prevail,
For I am with you,
to deliver and rescue you, says the LORD.
I will free you from the hand of the wicked,
and rescue you from the grasp of the violent.

Responsorial Psalm ps 59:2-3, 4, 10-11, 17, 18

R. (17d) God is my refuge on the day of distress.
Rescue me from my enemies, O my God;
from my adversaries defend me.
Rescue me from evildoers;
from bloodthirsty men save me.
R. God is my refuge on the day of distress.
For behold, they lie in wait for my life;
mighty men come together against me,
Not for any offense or sin of mine, O LORD.
R. God is my refuge on the day of distress.
O my strength! for you I watch;
for you, O God, are my stronghold,
As for my God, may his mercy go before me;
may he show me the fall of my foes.
R. God is my refuge on the day of distress.
But I will sing of your strength
and revel at dawn in your mercy;
You have been my stronghold,
my refuge in the day of distress.
R. God is my refuge on the day of distress.
O my strength! your praise will I sing;
for you, O God, are my stronghold,
my merciful God!
R. God is my refuge on the day of distress.

Gospel mt 13:44-46

Jesus said to his disciples:
“The Kingdom of heaven is like a treasure buried in a field,
which a person finds and hides again,
and out of joy goes and sells all that he has and buys that field.
Again, the Kingdom of heaven is like a merchant
searching for fine pearls.
When he finds a pearl of great price,
he goes and sells all that he has and buys it.”

Fr.Angelo Geiger and Fr. Alfonso Bruno want the Franciscans of the Immaculate and the whole Church to accept Vatican Council II with an irrationality


I have sent these blog posts to Father Alfonso Bruno spokesman of Fr.Fidenzio Volpi Ofm.cap, the Apostolic Commissioner of the Franciscans of the Immaculate. I am still waiting for a reply. There is a report in Italian by Fr.Angelo Geiger on their official website.It  states 'No one in this discussion casts serious doubt that Tradition and the Magisterium should be the criteria for the interpretation of Vatican II. ' 1 Where does Tradition and the Magisterium say that the deceased now in Heaven are physically visible to us on earth? And so since they are known and visible in real life they become exceptions to Tradition?

Why does the whole Church have to accept all this nonsense?

How can being saved with ' a ray of the Truth' (Nostra Aetate 2) be an explicit exception to the traditional teaching which says all Jews,Muslims and other need to convert with the baptism of water and Catholic Faith for salvation.? How can Fr.Angelo Geiger imply that we know exceptions in 2014, to this traditional teaching of the Church.

They want the Friars and Sisters of the Franciscans of the Immaculate to proclaim this lie in the interpretation of Vatican Council II before they are allowed to offer the Traditional Latin Mass and teach at their seminary? 
They have to say that they can see the dead.-saved, who are visible exceptions to all needing to convert into the Church.So there is known salvation outside the Church ?

For me Vatican Council II (Ad Gentes 7) is saying all Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, Muslims etc are on the way to Hell since they do not have Catholic Faith and the baptism of water.They do not have 'faith and baptism'.  For me there is no text in Vatican Council II which refers to visible for us cases, of non Catholics being saved in 'invincible ignorance'(LG 16), imperfect  communion with the Church (UR 3) etc.So there are no exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. LG 16,NA 2,UR 3 etc are not exceptions. I accept them as possibilities known only to God. I reject the theory which says that they are explicit exceptions.
So this is the hermeneutic of continuity for me.It  is in agreement with Tradition and the Magisterium .Most important of all it is a rational interpretation of Vatican Council II.
Why cannot Fr.Angelo Geiger and Father Alfonso Bruno   affirm this rational interpretation of Vatican Council II? Set an
example for the other Franciscans.
Why must the main group of Franciscans interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the past using  the dead man walking and visible theory ? Why must they allege, as Catholics, that they can see the dead-saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) etc. No text in Vatican Council II makes this claim unless one infers wrongly.
Vatican Council II being a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is false.To have a 'career' in the Church religious are expected to accept this falsehood. This irrational interpretation of the Council is being forced upon the Franciscans of the Immaculate by Fr.Fidenzio Volpi. This is a Vatican Council II which is a break with Tradition and which is heretical.It contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (which Fr.Angelo Geiger will not affirm) and changes the Nicene Creed.
This dead man walking  interpretation of Vatican Council II approved by the Left, is being foisted on the Franciscans of the Immaculate.It is being forced upon them by the Vatican Curia and the Apostolic Commissioner.Then when they do not accept this irrationality ( as they should not as good Catholics)  they are  told that they are being disobedient to the pope.
If Pope Francis says Jesus is not God or the Holy Mass is not the Sacrifice of Jesus re enacted, we just reject it.If the pope rejects a defined dogma and interprets Vatican Council II with an irrationality it has to be rejected.
When the irrationality is repeated even after the concerned persons are informed , it becomes a falsehood. The irrationality is a falsehood.
-Lionel Andrades


L’inganno Cripto-Lefebvriano: un Francescano dell’Immacolata risponde a De Mattei

Fr.Angelo Geiger and his Franciscans of the Immaculate group cannot accept Vatican Council II ( inference-free) because of extra ecclesiam nulla salus