For 40 years the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) ,Albano, Italy has been interpreting Vatican Council II with an irrational inference and has been rejecting Vatican Council II without the false inference.
Also for 40 years they have assumed that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance referred to visible in the flesh cases, who were exceptions to the defined dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
This is heresy.
The SSPX community of religious at Albano,(Fraternità Sacerdotale San Pio X) the SSPX Headquarters in Italy,have celebrated 40 years of its existence in Italy.
For 40 years they were not aware that Pope Pius XII made a mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 when he mistook implicit desire, as being explicit.So for him it contradicted the traditional interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney.
Those Catholics who held to the literal interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus, were pejoratively called 'Feeneyites' by the SSPX and were said to be in heresy.Recently the pro SSPX Fr.Paul Kramer has made this charge on a traditionalist forum.
The SSPX Albano was not aware that the baptism of desire could be accepted as implicit for us and rejected as being explicit.Albano has held the irrational explicit for us position.
With this irrationality of salvation in Heaven being visible to us on earth, they interpreted Vatican Council II for 40 years.
Many of their books and magazines, published in Italian, criticize Nostra Aetate 2, Vatican Council II ,' a ray of the Truth'.Since they assume it is explicit and contradicts extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Tradition.
However they also considered ' implicit desire' (Letter of the Holy Office 1949) as being explicit and an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus but did not criticize Pope Pius XII.
The SSPX Albano has criticized Pope John Paul II, during the recent canonisation, for suggesting there were exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.It was not mentioned that Archbishop Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops have also stated that there were exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus i.e the non Catholic saved in his religion through Jesus and the Church.This phenomenon is objectively visible for the SSPX.
So when the religious at Albano make a Profession of Faith with the Nicene Creed, they have assumed there were three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins ( water, desire and blood).This is the same politically correct position as the liberals and Masons, whom they otherwise correctly criticize.
The SSPX priests offer the Traditional Latin Mass while believing there are explicit exceptions to the defined dogma on salvation and the Nicene Creed ( I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins). This is first class heresy in Pope John Paul II's hierarchy of truths.There is only one known baptism, the baptism of water. The baptism of desire and blood are visible only to God.So they cannot be exceptions to all needing to enter the Church with the baptism of water.
Without the irrational inference ( visible- dead exceptional theory) Vatican Council II ( Ad Gentes 7) is in agreement with extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Tradition and there are no exceptions in the Council's text.Vatican Council II ( without the inference) is in agreement with the SSPX traditional position on other religions and Christian communities.Yet they will not affirm Vatican Council II without the inference.
They assume there are exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II which contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is the confused SSPX position which contradicts the SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012 which endorsed extra ecclesiam nulla salus and said there were no exceptions.
This is all confusion and a rejection of traditional Catholic doctrine over 40 years.