Comment on Fr.Ray Blake's blog
In a changing world would you accept a 'Feeneyite' as a Catholic who holds the traditional and literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus along with implicit for us baptism of desire but without explicit for us baptism of desire.
A Feeneyite is someone who accepts being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire as a possibility but not a known exception in specific cases, to the literal interpretation of Fr. Leonard Feeney, on the dogma.
So there are no known exceptions in 2014 to the 'rigorist', literal and traditional interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney ?
And if you are willing to accept this CHANGE then could you concede that there is nothing in Vatican Council II to reject the 'rigorist' interpretation on extra ecclesiam nulla salus?
And if you are still with me would you be willing to say that Vatican Council II is pro-Fr.Leonard Feeney ?
Vatican Council II in 2014 is Feeneyite?