Michael Voris interviews Patrick Archbald. Both of them are using the hermeneutic of discontinuity in the interpretation of Vatican Council II: they are using a false statement to interpret the Council.
They have never interpreted Vatican Council II as being in accord with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and with no ambiguity. There has always been ambiguity for them Since they assume that all salvation referred to in Vatican Council is visible, known, explicit.This is irrational. With this irrational understanding they reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Then they blame the Council.