Friday, February 21, 2014

Priest in Purgatory appears to Maria Simma: RECEIVE THE EUCHARIST KNEELING AND ON THE TONGUE ONLY

Vatican Council did not allow receiving the Eucharist at Mass in the hand.Neither did Vatican Council II recommend receiving the Eucharist standing. This was done by Freemason cardinals says Maria Simma.
 
Maria Simma had a special charism with souls in Purgatory.She could see them and speak to them.
 
A priest was in Purgatory. He said he suffered for introducing in his Church this mode of receiving the Eucharist.
 
He  thought  Vatican Council II had introduced this manner of  receiving the Eucharist.
 
He was being punished in Purgatory.
 
She says those who can receive the Eucharist kneeling should do so. Also do not receive the Eucharist in the palm of the hand.
-Lionel Andrades


Maria Simma e le anime purganti








Gloria Polo Testimonianza e documentario







Identifying Archbishop Lefebvre's mistake has made the Novus Ordo Mass 'ideological'

Catholic priests who offer Holy Mass in the vernacular  and those who offer the Traditonal Latin Mass (TLM), now know there are no known exceptions in Vatican Council II  to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
In the past traditionalists who offered the Traditional Latin Mass  affirmed the dogma on exclusive salvation  and rejected Vatican Council II. Those who offered the Novus Ordo Mass, in general, with some exceptions, affirmed Vatican Council II (with the dead-saved and visible theory) and  rejected the dogma on exclusive salvation.
Like Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Michael Davis, the SSPX bishops and priests,they assumed there are known exceptions to the dogma in Vatican Council II (UR 3, LG 8, LG 16, NA 2 etc).
Now preists who offer Holy Mass in the vernacular  can affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to St. Robert Bellarmine, St. Francis Xavier, St. Ignatius of Loyola, St, Francis of Assisi etc. Vatican Council II is in perfect agreement with St.Robert Bellarmine on other religions and ecumenism.
Without the Lefebvre mistake of being able to see the dead-saved with the naked eye, the Novus Ordo Mass and the Traditional Latin Mass has the same 'ideology'.
It is the ideology not approved by Pope Francis.(1)
Avoiding the Lefebvre mistake, the priest  who offers Holy Mass in Boston, for example, knows Jews need to convert  for salvation according to Ad  Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 and there are no known exceptions.This is not the Good Friday Prayer for the Conversion of the Jews in the Tridentine Rite Mass. This is Vatican Council II!
So, without the Lefebvre error, when Archbishop Arthur Roche,the Secretary of the Congregation for Divine Worship,Vatican offers Holy Mass in English or Italian he indicates that he affirms the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Ad Gentes 7 which supports the dogma.This is the ecclesiology of Vatican Council II.
So for Archbishop Roche there cannot be a hermeneutic of discontinuity with the past (2) unless he assumes we can see the deceased in Heaven saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16 ) etc, who are known exceptions to Tradition, producing a hermeneutic of discontinuity.Without this irrationality, there is only a hermeneutic of continuity.
-Lionel Andrades
 
 
1.
“Vatican II was a re-reading of the Gospel in light of contemporary culture,” says the pope. “Vatican II produced a renewal movement that simply comes from the same Gospel. Its fruits are enormous. Just recall the liturgy. The work of liturgical reform has been a service to the people as a re-reading of the Gospel from a concrete historical situation. Yes, there are hermeneutics of continuity and discontinuity, but one thing is clear: the dynamic of reading the Gospel, actualizing its message for today—which was typical of Vatican II—is absolutely irreversible. Then there are particular issues, like the liturgy according to the Vetus Ordo. I think the decision of Pope Benedict [his decision of July 7, 2007, to allow a wider use of the Tridentine Mass] was prudent and motivated by the desire to help people who have this sensitivity. What is worrying, though, is the risk of the ideologization of the Vetus Ordo, its exploitation.”(emphasis added)http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2013/09/the-popes-interview-to-civilta.html
 
2
 Yes, there are hermeneutics of continuity and discontinuity, but one thing is clear: the dynamic of reading the Gospel, actualizing its message for today—which was typical of Vatican II—is absolutely irreversible.-Pope Francis


The 'doors are open' for the SSPX to bring the Church back to Tradition! http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/02/the-doors-are-open-for-sspx-to-bring.html#links

They were always correct : there are no known exceptions to the dogma

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/02/they-were-always-correct-there-are-no.html#links

ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE, MICHAEL DAVIS MADE AN OBJECTIVE MISTAKE: TRADITIONALISTS ARE STILL REELING
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/02/archbishop-lefebvre-michael-davis-made.html#links 




CATHOLIC PRIESTS CORRECT SEDEVACANTISTS: EXPLICIT BAPTISM OF DESIRE IS KNOWN ONLY TO GOD

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2011/09/catholic-priests-correct-sedevacantists.html#links
 

REDEMPTORIST PRIEST SAYS VATICAN COUNCIL II DOES NOT CONTRADICT ITSELF NOR THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUShttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/10/redemptorist-priest-says-vatican.html#links

Implicit intention, invincible ignorance and a good conscience (LG 16) in Vatican Council II do not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus –John Martigionihttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/implicit-intention-invincible-ignorance.html#links
 

ht
tp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/archbishop-thomas-egullickson-says.html#links


Photo from the CMRI blog