This is a rejection of the Syllabus of Errors, the Social Doctrine of Christ the King and extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the traditionalists and sedevacantists have noticed nothing.

The Society of St.Pius (SSPX) and the Vatican are making an objective errror. This can be seen clearly in CCC 1257 against which the SSPX has never protested.

Janet:
You can never negotiate with the devil! I guess history is proving that right as we see the Society of Saint Pius X negotiating with the devil for alleged unity
Rome has a heretic on the throne of Peter, and we as Catholics should unite and demand our Church BACK.

Lionel:
The Society of St.Pius (SSPX) and the Vatican are making an objective errror. This can be seen clearly in CCC 1257 against which the SSPX has never protested.

See it here:
Here it says all need the baptism of water for salvation in the present times.

1257 'The Lord himself affirms that Baptism is necessary for salvation. He also commands his disciples to proclaim the Gospel to all nations and to baptize them. Baptism is necessary for salvation...'

Then it says that for some, in the present times, baptism is not necessary for salvation i.e those who are in ignorance. (Note :the baptism of water can only be given in the present times. So we are not referring to a hypothetical case here)

 'for those to whom the Gospel has been proclaimed and who have had the possibility of asking for this sacrament.'

Then once again it says that the baptism of water is defacto necessary. This would mean every one in 2014 needs the baptism of water.

'The Church does not know of any means other than Baptism that assures entry into eternal beatitude'

Then it refers to some who do not need the baptism of water defacto. They are those who do not have the means of being baptised. In other words we defacto know where the necessity of means and precept can be applied. This is not just the prerogative of Jesus to judge. Seemingly even we can judge.

'that all who can be baptized '
Then comes the cream of the double speak and assuming hypothethical cases are defacto visible to us in the present times.

'God has bound salvation to the sacrament of Baptism, but he himself is not bound by his sacraments.'

God has bound salvation to the sacrament of baptism in the present times but every one does not need the Sacrament of baptism in the present times.

Apparently Cardinal Ratzinger personally knew of a defacto exception, a person who would be going to Heaven without the baptism of water.This line is contrary to the Principle of Non Contradiction.

Here is the complete text of CCC 1257.

1257 The Lord himself affirms that Baptism is necessary for salvation. He also commands his disciples to proclaim the Gospel to all nations and to baptize them. Baptism is necessary for salvation for those to whom the Gospel has been proclaimed and who have had the possibility of asking for this sacrament. The Church does not know of any means other than Baptism that assures entry into eternal beatitude; this is why she takes care not to neglect the mission she has received from the Lord to see that all who can be baptized are "reborn of water and the Spirit." God has bound salvation to the sacrament of Baptism, but he himself is not bound by his sacraments.

This is a rejection of the Syllabus of Errors, the Social Doctrine of Christ the King and extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the traditionalists and sedevacantists have noticed nothing.
-Lionel Andrades


 

http://stevensperay.wordpress.com/2014/11/27/the-sedevacantist-saint-vincent-ferrer/#comments