The Council can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism. With Cushingism Vatican Council II is a break with the Syllabus of Errors

God has limited himself to the Sacraments according to the dogma and Vatican Council II (AG 7). Yet this is contrary to the statement in CCC 1257 which has come from the irrationality of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.It says God is not limited to the Sacraments.This error is based on Cushingism.It is contrary to the Principle of Non Contradiction to have said in CCC 1257 that God is not limited to the Sacraments and also God is limited to the Sacraments.One of the two statements in CCC 1257 has to be wrong.The statement : God is not limited to the Sacraments contradicts the Syllabus of Errors and Tradition.


Yesterday I was talking to a young man Elia who was better informed than me on Catholic Tradition. He quoted Pope Pius IX saying that if any one changed the liturgy in any way let him be anathema.We know that in 1965 the liturgy was changed.

He thought Vatican Council II was a break with the Syllabus of Errors. I disagreed with him. I mentioned that the Council can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism. With Cushingism Vatican Council II is a break with the Syllabus of Errors.

The Church has not changed its teaching on other religions according to Church Documents, interpreted with Feeneyism ( no visible exceptions to the dogma).
 

The Vatican, we agreed, is interpreting Vatican Council II as a break with the Syllabus of Errors.
 

Catholics also need to be free to proclaim their faith in Italy .Catholics believe that all Muslims and other non Catholics are on the way to Hell, unless they convert into the Catholic Church, according to Vatican Council II (Ad Gentes 7).
 

Vatican Council II indicates that the Prophet Mohammad is lost eternally since he died without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7). Also he know about the Catholic Church but did not enter. So he could not be saved according to Vatican Council II (Lumen Gentium 14). All non Catholics, are on the way to Hell is the official teaching of the Church before and after Vatican Council II, the Church tells us in its documents.
 

Jesus died to save all, including Muslims. To receive this salvation all need to respond with 'faith and baptism' (Dominus Iesus 20).Those who believe will be saved those who do not will be condemned (Mk.16:16). All need the baptism of water for salvation (John 3:5).

 

Members of other religions are oriented into the Church and are called to be part of the Catholic Church for salvation.(CDF, Notification on Fr.Jaquis Dupuis S.J,2001 ).

 

This is the Catholic Faith. Those who are saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16), imperfect communion with the Church(UR 3), a ray of the Truth (NA 2), seeds of the Word (AG 11) are known only to God. So they are not explicit exceptions to all needing 'faith and baptism'.

Mohammad, Ali and the Muslim leaders did not not have the Catholic Faith.They did not have the baptism of water  through which Jesus saves.They were oriented to 'the fires of Hell' (Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441).

Those who are saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16), elements of sanctification and truth(LG 8) etc would also have received the baptism of water and Catholic Faith before going to Heaven.Since this is the ordinary means of salvation.This is the norm.This is the teaching of Vatican Council II (AG 7).We do not know anyone in 2014 who is an exception to the norm i.e who is in Heaven without the baptism of water and Catholic Faith.
 

Catholics must have the freedom to proclaim their Faith inspite of so much confusion all about us.The confusion is ecclesiastical .The religious contradict the truth.

The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made an objective error when it assumed that the baptism of desire etc referred to visible- to- us- cases. This is Cushingism. Most Catholics interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism. Cushingism is irrational, non traditional and heretical. Without this irrationality, in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Council supports traditional Feeneyism, the exclusive ecclesiology.

Lumen Gentium  16 etc can be interpreted according to Cushingism or Feeneyism and most people choose the irrational way.So they would say that all Jews, Muslims and other non Catholics do not need to convert into the Catholic Church in 2014 in Italy, for example, since there could be exceptions (baptism of desire etc) who are visible to us.They are visible exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus even though these cases are in Heaven? How can you meet or see someone in Italy who is also in Heaven? How can these invisible cases be exceptions to the Syllabus of Errors? So how can there be a change in ecclesiology based on invisible cases?. We cannot see or meet any one saved outside the Church.
 

God has limited himself to the Sacraments according to the dogma and Vatican Council II (AG 7). Yet this is  contrary to the statement in CCC 1257 which has come from the irrationality of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.It says God is not limited to the Sacraments.This error is based on Cushingism.It is contrary to the Principle of Non Contradiction to have said in CCC 1257 that God is not limited to the Sacraments and also that God is limited to the
Sacraments .One of the two statements in CCC 1257 has to be wrong.The statement : God is  not limited to the Sacraments contradicts the Syllabus of Errors and Tradition. -Lionel Andrades