Friday, November 7, 2014

No one from the SSPX to defend John Vennari and Louie Verrecchio


Lionel:
No one from the SSPX to defend John Vennari and Louie Verrechio??!!
Wow!
Lionel
_________________________________________________
 
John and Louie have the same position as Bishop Marcello Semeraro of Albano and Bishop Sarlinga of the Argentinian diocese, on UR 3 being a known exceptionj to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Ad Gentes 7, the Nicene Creed and Tradition in general.
Both groups could exchange greeting cards next month.
___________________________________________________
 





Louie and John have not mentioned Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation. AG 7 is traditional and in agreemen with Tradiion on salvation.
Also how can UR 3 be an exception to Tradition and in particular the dogma on salvation ? Do we know any one in 2014 saved in imperfect communion with the Church(UR 3)?
They both are assuming that someone saved outside the visible limits of the Church are known and visible to us.
The fault is with the reader of the Council and not with the text of the Council.
The ambiguity and heresy comes from using an irrational premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.
if they both did not infer that those saved in imperfect communion with the church are visible UR 3 would not be non Traditional.
-Lionel Andrades
http://www.harvestingthefruit.com/fcchicago/?loggedout=true



No comments: