Mons .Lorenzo Leuzzi is also promoting an irrational version of Vatican Council II contrary to the Social Reign of Christ the King

 

I.H.
If what Fr. Harrison says about the philosophy of Vatican Council II with regards to its policy of compromise with the world for now until the “prudent” time arrives when the social reign of Christ can be restored, then we are in truly sorry shape because it shows the bishops were ignorant of the basics of Salvation History and Old Testament Covenant theology

Lionel:
Last Sunday there was Mass here in Italian. It was a subdued feast of Christ the King . There was no mention of the need for the Social Reign of Christ over all political and social legislation. Nor was there an affirmation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or Vatican Council II (AG 7) , which affirms the Reign of Christ the King over all the universe, in concrete terms.

The priests could not speak about this, if they knew about it, since it is prohibited by the Vatican. There are political forces that have been constantly threathening the Vatican.Now there is a pope who is not affirming the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political systems. Instead he has gone to the other extreme. This was seen in the recent Synod. He is instead adapting to the evil system.

I recently spoke to an Augustinian Recollect priest who is studying some aspect of St. Augustine at a pontifical university in Rome. He was not aware of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

One cannot blame him. Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger did not mention it in the Catechism of the Catholic Church.He himself did not seem to believe in it.

Pope Benedict XVI seemed to believe that there is salvation outside the Church.It was as if he knew someone who was saved in the present times without the baptism of water.This is the compulsory political teaching at the pontifical universities.
Catholic seminarians have to claim :
1.They can see the dead saved in Heaven who are visible on earth.
2.These deceased now saved in Heaven are exceptions to the traditional teaching on salvation and the Social Kingship of Christ the King.
This is acceptable politically by the Left even though it is irrational and not Catholic.

A few minutes back on the teleradiopadrepio 1 I saw Monsignor Lorenzo Leucci, one of the auxiliary bishops of Rome in the Holy Land with a group of pilgrims representing the Rome Vicariate.
Mons.Lorenzo like the other bishops (Mons. Matteo Zuppi etc) here will not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.I asked him last year if we knew of any one in the present times, saved in invincible ignorance or the baptism of desire. He would not answer. I asked him if being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire, (which is unknown to us in the present times), could be an explicit exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. He would not answer.
These questions were asked of him in writing.
So what kind of dialogue is he and the other Catholic religious promoting in the Holy Land and everywhere else.It is a dialogue based on not speaking the truth about Catholic teachings. This is accepted by the political forces who overlook the Vatican.1.Mons .Leuzzi is also promoting an irrational version of Vatican Council II.It is a Vatican Council II in which those saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16), seeds of the Word (AG 11) etc refer to known persons in the present times.They are visible on earth.
2.He alleges also that these people now in Heaven are explicitly seen on earth and so are exceptions to the traditional teaching on salvation, ecumenism,religous liberty ( based on the dogma) and the Social Reign of Jesus Christ .Jesus as known in the Catholic Church, being at the center of all political legislation.

It means affirming, that in Rome, all people with no exception, need the Eucharist, the Sacrament of Confession and the other Sacraments.-Lionel Andrades

1.
http://www.teleradiopadrepio.it/interna.php?bread=Video&inc=video&t=Video

http://www.harvestingthefruit.com/uncrowned/#comment-27342