There is an interesting discussion on the CathInfo forum.They still have not understood that being saved in invincible ignorance is not an exception in the present times to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Being saved as such refer to unknown cases for us.
So many in the Catholic Church assume that there are known exceptions to the dogma and then they go into the theology. They remain in theological circles. They are unaware of the difference between Cushingism and Feeneyism.
-Lionel Andrades
1.
Pope John Paul II also fell before the objective error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 http://eucharistandmission.
Franciscans of the Immaculate accepted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and the Cushingite version of Vatican Council II http://eucharistandmission.
If the Letter of the Holy Office simply referred to implicit desire and being saved in invincible ignorance and left it at that it would be fine
http://eucharistandmission.
Sedevacantists "traditionalists in name only" share the same very mistake with the liberals Novus Ordo Catholics-Cantarella http://eucharistandmission.
The Holy Office 1949 made a mistake. Cardinal Marchetti-Selvaggiani assumed there are known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus-Cantarella, CathInfo forum http://eucharistandmission.
Fr.Pierpaolo Petrucci,District Superior,SSPX makes the same error as the Letter of the Holy Office 1949: faulty reasoning on two videos 
Posts
1 comment:
The definition of invincible is"
'incapable of being conquered, defeated, or subdued. 2. insuperable; insurmountable'
of course invincible ignorance is not an exception to " No Salvation Outside the Catholic Church"
The Catholic Church could never offer Invincible Ignorance to anyone as an option for Salvation. It is a completely mute point to the teaching mission of the Church.
Post a Comment