Michael Davis, Romano Amerio, Dietrich von Hildebrand were not aware of the irrational premise which makes Vatican Council II a break with Tradition.They interpreted Vatican Council II assuming LG 16,LG 8 etc were visible exceptions in the present times to all needing to enter the Catholic Church.
Like Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops, they accepted this error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 believing that the 'magisterium' could not be wrong. The Letter wrongly infers that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are exceptions to the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney. In other words, these cases are visible and known to us, for them to be exceptions.With this irrationality, the Letter opposed the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Church's understanding of other religions and Christian communities.
This information is still difficult for some of the lay members and leaders of the traditionalist movement who held a conference in England for Michael Davis. Someone objected to the following links, on the blog LMS Chairman, and so they were removed.
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment