SSPX must not announce that they reject Vatican Council II

I hope the SSPX will not announce that they cannot accept Vatican Council II.

They must announce that they accept Vatican Council II interpreted without the irrational premise.They must announce that they accept Vatican Council II interpreted with Feeneyism.

They need to announce that they reject Vatican Council II, the Vatican Curia-version, interpreted with Cushingism.

They must announce that they accept Vatican Council II according to the SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012 which says there are no exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

They must clarify that they accept Vatican Council II (without the premise) and also affirm Tradition.

They accept the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance as possibilities and not known realities in 2014 so they simultaneously also affirm 'the rigorist interpretation' of Fr.Leonard Feeney and the SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012 on extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

They must clarify that 'the Hindu in Tibet' whom Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre said is saved in his religion through Jesus and the Church,is not a visible exception in 2014  to all needing the  baptism of water for salvation.

If the SSPX announces that they reject Vatican Council II it means they still do not understand that they are rejecting Vatican Council II according to Cushingism and are not aware of the other interpretation which is rational, pro-Tradition and which the liberals hate.

-Lionel Andrades