Cardinal Raymond Burke,Prefect of the Apostolic Trubunal (Signatura) lost his office since he saw the truth ? He decided that:
1.The excommunication of Fr.Leonard Feeney, if it was for Catholic doctrine, was a mistake since cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are not known in real life. This is related to the Franciscans of the Immaculate's acceptance of Vatican Council II.
2. So there was an error in the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1257) when it says with reference to the necessity of the Baptism of Water that 'God is not limited to the Sacraments'. While Christianity and the World Religions and The Hope Of Salvation for Infants who die without being baptized of the ITC wrongly infers that there are known exceptions to the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney. It is with this irrational inference that the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate have to accept Vatican Council II.
3.The Letter of the Holy Office 1949, during the pontificate of Pope PIus XII, was wrong when it inferred that the baptism of desire/ implicit desire and being saved in invincible ignorance were exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.No one at the Vatican is admitting this.
4.Similarly those saved with ' a ray of the Truth'(NA 2), imperfect communion with the Church(UR 3), invincible ignorance(LG 16), elements of sanctification and truth (LG 8),substitit it (LG 8), seeds of the Word (LG 8) etc are invisible for us. They cannot be exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation.
So Ad Gentes 7 supports Feeneyism and NA 2 etc are not exceptions to Feeneyism.Vatican Council II is traditional on other religions and Christian communities.
Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, Muslims etc need faith and baptism (AG 7) to avoid Hell and go to Heaven and Orthodox Christians,Protestants etc need Catholic Faith, which include the Sacraments through which Jesus saves, and the faith and moral teachings of the Catholic Church to avoid mortal sin and preserve Sanctifying Grace.
Cardinal Joao Braz de Aviz ,Prefect of the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life and Fr.Fidenzio Volpi Ofm.Cap, the Apostolic Commissioner of the Franciscans of the Immaculate, were asked to affirm a rational Vatican Council II and clarify that
this is the Vatican Council II which they expect the Franciscans
of the Immaculate to accept.
this is the Vatican Council II which they expect the Franciscans
of the Immaculate to accept.
They were asked to clarify that they do not expect the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate, to accept Vatican Council II in which all references to salvation are considered to be visible for us instead of invisible.
According to Canon Law Cardinal Joao Braz de Aviz and Fr.Fidenzio Volpi are expected to accept all the teachings of the Catholic Church. Cardinal Joao Braz de Aviz and Fr.Fidenzio Volpi must accept Vatican Council II in agreement with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was interpreted over the centuries, by the Church Councils, popes and saints.
Here is the original report on this blog Eucharist and Mission.
September 5, 2014
Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate appeal to the Signatura with the following facts
-Lionel Andrades
September 17, 2014
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment