Tuesday, August 19, 2014

Until today there is no apology issued from the Vatican or the Jesuits

Church Texts Condemning Feeneyism Richard J. Cushing, Archbishop of Boston – Decree Regarding Leonard Feeney, April 18, 1949
Rev. Leonard Feeney, S.J., because of grave offense against the laws of the Catholic Church has lost the right to perform any priestly function, including preaching and teaching of religion.
Any Catholics who frequent St. Benedict’s Center, or who in any way take part in or assist its activities forfeit the right to receive the Sacrament of Penance and Holy Eucharist.
Given at Boston on the 18th day of April, 1949.
 
Cardinal Richard Cushing, the Archbishop of Boston  denied the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus by assuming there were known exceptions. Then he issued a decree against Fr.Leonard Feeney prohibiting him from using his priestly faculties.He prevented Catholics from going to the St.Benedict Center.
 
This was public heresy and the Holy Office did not excommunicate the archbishop of Boston.Neither did they support Fr.Leonard Feeney on doctrine.
Until today there is no apology issued by the Vatican or the Jesuits.
 
The irrational interpretation of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance is being used by most Catholics, in the interpretation of Vatican Council II. It is this error which makes Vatican Council II a break with the past.
This is the missing link which can affect a reconciliation with the Society of St.Pius X and the Franciscans of the Immaculate. Correct the error and Vatican Council II is traditional on other religions and ecumenism. Ad Gentes 7 has the same message as extra ecclesiam nulla salus and NA 2,UR 3 etc being implicit and not explicit, are not exceptions to AG 7 or the interpretation of the dogma according to Fr.Leonard Feeney.
Cushingism is the missing jigsaw piece one has to be aware of .It can make Vatican Council non traditional and irrational.Vatican Council II was originally traditional before the Cushingite error.

No comments: