Do Michael Voris, Louie Verrechio and others realize they are making the same fault as Fr.Jonathan Morris?

Fr.Jonathan Morris said that it is not every one needs to be a Catholic, since he assumes there are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. He assumes there are known exceptions outside the Catholic Church to all needing the baptism of water for salvation.In other words every one does not need to convert into the Church to avoid Hell.So Michael Voris asks Fr.Morris who in the present times does not need to enter the Church and will be saved.Obvioulsy Fr.Morris cannot say that any particular person will be saved without 'faith and baptism'.Neither does not Vatican Council II state that there are known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus .Yet THIS IS THE VERY MISTAKE MADE BY MICHAEL VORIS in the interpretation of Vatican Council !!! In the interview with Louie Verrechio, both of them assumed that Vatican Council II is a break with the past.This is because they assumed that those saved with 'a ray of the Truth'(NA 2), 'elements of sanctification and truth'(LG 8), invincible ignorance (LG 16,AG 7) etc are examples of being saved outside the Church.They are examples of persons who are saved without entering the Church. So the question for Michael Voris, Louis Verricho, Patrick Archbald, Robert Sungenis and others is who in the present times does not need to enter the Church and will be saved according to NA 2, LG 16, UR 3 ? Do they realize that they are making the same fault as Fr.Jonathan Morris? -Lionel Andrades