If the Holy Office suggested that implicit desire was an exception, to the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney, then it would be saying that a hypothethical case is an exception ?

All salvation is hypothetical, Lionel; no exceptions.

Lionel:

So if the Holy Office suggested that implicit desire was an exception, to the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney, then it would be saying that a hypothethical case is an exception ? It would be a mistake ?

-Lionel Andrades

Franciscans of the Immaculate are not obliged to follow the Letter of the Holy Office's factual mistake

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/franciscans-of-immaculate-are-not.html#links

The Letter of the Holy Office makes it an issue. It considers the baptism of desire an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/07/the-letter-of-holy-office-makes-it.html#links

Where is the actual case of someone saved outside the Church ? There is none

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/where-is-actual-case-of-someone-saved.html#links

Supporters of Fr.Leonard Feeney unfortunately still use the irrational inference .It can be seen in their interpretation of Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/supporters-of-frleonard-feeney.html#links

 

Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake with the Letter of the Holy Office and carried it over into Vatican Council II  ttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/archbishop-lefebvre-made-mistake-with.html#links

Where does the Letter of the Holy Office make a factual error ? 

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/where-does-letter-of-holy-office-make.html#links

 

Implicit desire is always implicit. Did the Holy Office assume it was explicit?  

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/implicit-desire-is-always-implicit-did.html#links

I talk in terms of visible and invisible only because Catholics in general are unaware that they are using these terms  ttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/i-talk-in-terms-of-visible-and.html#links

Objectively we cannot see a baptism of desire case: the Holy Office 1949 implies we can http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/objectively-we-cannot-see-baptism-of.html#links

The Holy Office 1949 used the dead man walking and visible theory : it was a mistake

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/the-holy-office-1949-used-dead-man.html#links

 

Factual Errors in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949

 http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/factual-errors-in-letter-of-holy-office.html#links

Catholic Religious indicate the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made a factual mistake :implicit desire etc is not visible to us http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/catholic-religious-indicate-letter-of.html#links