There is no text in Vatican Council II which contradicts Feeneyism

Feeneyism is the official teaching of the Catholic Church unless one assumes implicit for us baptism of desire is explicit for us.

According to Feeneyism  every one needs to enter the Catholic Church with 'faith and baptism' and there are no exceptions.

 

According to Feeneyism  the baptism of desire is not an exception to the traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

 

According to Cushingism  every one does not need to enter the Catholic Church with faith and baptism  in 2014 and there are exceptions.

 

According to Cushingism  the baptism of desire is an exception to the traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus. 

 

According to Feeneyism Lumen Gentium 16 (invincible ignorance) is not an exception to Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism)  and the dogma on exclusive salvation. Vatican Council II is not confusing.

 

According to Cushingism Lumen Gentium 16  is an exception.Vatican Council II contradicts itself.
 

Feeneyism says there are no exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Cushingism says there are exceptions. Cushingism is heresy.

 

The Society of St.Pius X, Fischer More College and other traditionalists  have been using Cushingism. For liberals Cushingism is the basis for liberalism  and dissent with reference to Vatican Council II.

 

Vatican Council II  and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949  of Pope Pius XII, in two theological papers of the International Theological Commission, are interpreted according to Cushingism. The ITC papers were approved by Pope Benedict XVI.

 

Pope Francis expects the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate to accept Vatican Council II according to Cushingism, only then will they be allowed to offer the Traditional Latin Mass in Rome.

The Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate  could end the dead lock by announcing that they interpret Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents  according to Feeneyism. So they affirm Vatican Council II and Tradition ( the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Catechism of Pope Pius X, the Syllabus of Errors etc).

 

Similarly Michael King, the President of Fischer-More College, USA  could announce that they affirm Vatican Council II according to Feeneyism . He can ask Bishop Michael Olson, the bishop of Fort Worth, and the FSSP priests there, to also do the same.

 

The SSPX could clarify that in a discussion on the subject of the baptism of desire, there could be confusion over invisible for us  baptism of desire and visible to us  baptism of desire and that invisible for us  baptism of desire, is their rational choice.

 

They also need to point out the factual error on the website of the International Theological Commission. The same error is there on the SSPX website under the subject Feeneyism. The SSPX is critical of Feeneyism since for the SSPX, Feeneyism  refers to the rejection of explicit for us baptism of desire.

-Lionel Andrades

Photo: Fr.Leonard Feeney- now at the centre of two  interpretations of Vatican Council II.

http://www.marymediatrix.com/religious-life/friars.html