This is a serious issue!

This is a serious issue.It involves not only the SSPX and Bishop Bernard Fellay but others in the Church.

Padre Pio Prayer Groups, Neo Catechumenal Way, Charismatic Renewal, all the religious communities, Diocesan priests…

All salvation referred to in Vatican Council II i.e saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16), imperfect communion with the Church(UR 3).,seeds of the Word (AG 11), good and holy things in other religions (NA 2) are either:

 

COLUMN A

implicit   for us.

hypothetical 

invisible in the flesh                                       

dejure ( in principle)                               

subjective

OR

 

COLUMN B

explicit for us.

known in reality.

visible in teh flesh.

defacto ( in fact)

objective

 

So one can choose from COLUMN A or COLUMN  B.

If COLUMN B is chosen then Vatican Council II contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors and Tradition in general on other religions and Christian communities and churches. There are known exceptions in 2014 to the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Cathlic Church. The dead- saved are visible.

If COLUMN A is chosen then Vatican Council II does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus, nor Tradition on other religions and Christian communities and churches.
 

Most people interpret Vatican Council II with COLUMN B.

 

So the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance was never ever an exception to the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney, unless one is using COLUMN B.There were and are no known exceptions.

 

In 2014 the Padre Pio Prayer groups, the Neo Catechumenal Way, Charismatic Renewal, all the religious communities and most of the Diocesan priests are using the irrational column (COLUMN B) in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston 1949.
-Lionel Andrades