(Note: All the comments have returned on Protect the Pope. There was a misunderstanding.)
Gary:
The SSPX do not deny any doctrine of the Catholic faith – so please name what exactly these ‘heretical preconceptions’ are ?
Lionel:
Gary the SSPX assumes that there are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. The SSPX assumes that the baptism of desire is visible to us in real life and so is an exception to Tradition.
The baptism of desire can be accepted as a possibility and always invisible and implicit for us human beings. However for the SSPX it as visible and explicit for us. So this becomes a contradiction of the Catechism of Pope Pius X (27 Q) which says there is no salvation outside the Church.
For the SSPX Vatican Council II is a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors etc since they assume that LG 16, LG 8 etc refer to known exceptions to the dogma on exclusive salvation.
Gary the SSPX assumes that there are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. The SSPX assumes that the baptism of desire is visible to us in real life and so is an exception to Tradition.
The baptism of desire can be accepted as a possibility and always invisible and implicit for us human beings. However for the SSPX it as visible and explicit for us. So this becomes a contradiction of the Catechism of Pope Pius X (27 Q) which says there is no salvation outside the Church.
For the SSPX Vatican Council II is a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors etc since they assume that LG 16, LG 8 etc refer to known exceptions to the dogma on exclusive salvation.
This is a rejection of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and a change in the Nicene Creed to “I believe in three known baptisms for the forgiveness of sin".
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment